Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Rename ggtt_view as gtt_view

2022-09-08 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 07/09/2022 14:48, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 06/09/2022 17:14, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 05/09/2022 10:34, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 01/09/2022 19:38, Niranjana Vishwanathapura wrote: So far, different views (normal, partial, rotated and remapped) into the same object are only supported

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Rename ggtt_view as gtt_view

2022-09-07 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 06/09/2022 17:14, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 05/09/2022 10:34, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 01/09/2022 19:38, Niranjana Vishwanathapura wrote: So far, different views (normal, partial, rotated and remapped) into the same object are only supported for GGTT mappings. But with the upcoming

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Rename ggtt_view as gtt_view

2022-09-06 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 05/09/2022 10:34, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 01/09/2022 19:38, Niranjana Vishwanathapura wrote: So far, different views (normal, partial, rotated and remapped) into the same object are only supported for GGTT mappings. But with the upcoming VM_BIND feature, PPGTT will also use the partial

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Rename ggtt_view as gtt_view

2022-09-05 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 01/09/2022 19:38, Niranjana Vishwanathapura wrote: So far, different views (normal, partial, rotated and remapped) into the same object are only supported for GGTT mappings. But with the upcoming VM_BIND feature, PPGTT will also use the partial view mapping. Hence rename ggtt_view to more