Hi Thomas, Sinclair,
On 23 September 2016 at 18:26, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 08:08:28AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
>> Since fence_wait_timeout_reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu() with a
>> timeout of 0 becomes reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu(), we do not
>> need to
Hi,
I'm preparing a fixes pull request, and I'll include this one if it
hasn't been applied by others already.
Sinclair
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 09:41:22PM +0530, Sumit Semwal wrote:
> Hi Thomas, Sinclair,
>
> On 23 September 2016 at 18:26, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 08:08:28AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Since fence_wait_timeout_reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu() with a
> timeout of 0 becomes reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu(), we do not
> need to handle such conversion in the caller. The only challenge are
> those callers that
