[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/26] drm/arc: Implement nonblocking commit correctly

2016-05-30 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 11:36:06AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 30-05-16 om 11:24 schreef Daniel Vetter: > > On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 10:15:14AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > >> Op 29-05-16 om 20:35 schreef Daniel Vetter: > >>> Committing with block it is not. > >>> > >>> Thanks to the f

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/26] drm/arc: Implement nonblocking commit correctly

2016-05-30 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 30-05-16 om 11:24 schreef Daniel Vetter: > On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 10:15:14AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Op 29-05-16 om 20:35 schreef Daniel Vetter: >>> Committing with block it is not. >>> >>> Thanks to the fixed up vblank event handling we can just use the >>> helper support for nonblo

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/26] drm/arc: Implement nonblocking commit correctly

2016-05-30 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 10:15:14AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 29-05-16 om 20:35 schreef Daniel Vetter: > > Committing with block it is not. > > > > Thanks to the fixed up vblank event handling we can just use the > > helper support for nonblocking commits now. > > > > Cc: Carlos Palminha

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/26] drm/arc: Implement nonblocking commit correctly

2016-05-30 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 29-05-16 om 20:35 schreef Daniel Vetter: > Committing with block it is not. > > Thanks to the fixed up vblank event handling we can just use the > helper support for nonblocking commits now. > > Cc: Carlos Palminha > Cc: Alexey Brodkin > Cc: linux-snps-arc at lists.infradead.org > Signed-off-b