On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 23:20:25 -0700
Keith Packard wrote:
> No persistent data was ever stored here, so link_status is instead
> allocated on the stack as needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keith Packard
> ---
I like this cleanup.
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technolo
On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 23:20:25 -0700
Keith Packard wrote:
> No persistent data was ever stored here, so link_status is instead
> allocated on the stack as needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keith Packard
> ---
I like this cleanup.
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technolo
On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 23:20:25 -0700
Keith Packard wrote:
> No persistent data was ever stored here, so link_status is instead
> allocated on the stack as needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keith Packard
> ---
I like this cleanup.
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technolo
On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 23:20:25 -0700
Keith Packard wrote:
> No persistent data was ever stored here, so link_status is instead
> allocated on the stack as needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keith Packard
> ---
I like this cleanup.
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technolo
On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 23:20:25 -0700
Keith Packard wrote:
> No persistent data was ever stored here, so link_status is instead
> allocated on the stack as needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keith Packard
> ---
I like this cleanup.
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technolo
On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 23:20:25 -0700
Keith Packard wrote:
> No persistent data was ever stored here, so link_status is instead
> allocated on the stack as needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keith Packard
> ---
I like this cleanup.
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technolo
