On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 10:30:27AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 25/05/2021 18:15, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 10:24:09AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > >
> > > On 06/05/2021 20:13, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > > > With the introduction of non-blocking CTBs more than one
On 25/05/2021 18:15, Matthew Brost wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 10:24:09AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 06/05/2021 20:13, Matthew Brost wrote:
With the introduction of non-blocking CTBs more than one CTB can be in
flight at a time. Increasing the size of the CTBs should reduce how
often
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 10:24:09AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 06/05/2021 20:13, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > With the introduction of non-blocking CTBs more than one CTB can be in
> > flight at a time. Increasing the size of the CTBs should reduce how
> > often software hits the case where no
On 06/05/2021 20:13, Matthew Brost wrote:
With the introduction of non-blocking CTBs more than one CTB can be in
flight at a time. Increasing the size of the CTBs should reduce how
often software hits the case where no space is available in the CTB
buffer.
I'd move this before the patch which
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 03:43:11PM +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
>
>
> On 06.05.2021 21:13, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > With the introduction of non-blocking CTBs more than one CTB can be in
> > flight at a time. Increasing the size of the CTBs should reduce how
> > often software hits the case whe
On 06.05.2021 21:13, Matthew Brost wrote:
> With the introduction of non-blocking CTBs more than one CTB can be in
> flight at a time. Increasing the size of the CTBs should reduce how
> often software hits the case where no space is available in the CTB
> buffer.
>
> Cc: John Harrison
> Signe
