Re: [LSF/MM/BPF proposal]: Physr discussion

2023-04-17 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 12:59:41PM -0800, T.J. Mercier wrote: > On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 7:03 AM Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > > I would like to have a session at LSF to talk about Matthew's > > physr discussion starter: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/ydykweu0htv8m...@casper.infradead.org

Re: [LSF/MM/BPF proposal]: Physr discussion

2023-02-28 Thread T.J. Mercier
On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 7:03 AM Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > I would like to have a session at LSF to talk about Matthew's > physr discussion starter: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/ydykweu0htv8m...@casper.infradead.org/ > > I have become interested in this with some immediacy because of > IO

Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM/BPF proposal]: Physr discussion

2023-01-26 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 12:50:52PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote: > Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 11:36:51AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote: > > > Jason Gunthorpe via Lsf-pc wrote: > > > > I would like to have a session at LSF to talk about Matthew's > > > > physr discussion starter: > >

Re: [LSF/MM/BPF proposal]: Physr discussion

2023-01-26 Thread Mike Rapoport
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 04:36:25AM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 11:03:05AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > I would like to have a session at LSF to talk about Matthew's > > physr discussion starter: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/ydykweu0htv8m...@casper.infra

Re: [LSF/MM/BPF proposal]: Physr discussion

2023-01-25 Thread Zhu Yanjun
在 2023/1/21 23:03, Jason Gunthorpe 写道: I would like to have a session at LSF to talk about Matthew's physr discussion starter: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/ydykweu0htv8m...@casper.infradead.org/ I have become interested in this with some immediacy because of IOMMUFD and this other discuss

Re: [LSF/MM/BPF proposal]: Physr discussion

2023-01-23 Thread Chaitanya Kulkarni
On 1/23/23 11:47, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 1/23/23 05:44, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >> I've gone from quite a different starting point - I've been working >> DMA API upwards, so what does the dma_map_XX look like, what APIs do >> we need to support the dma_map_ops implementations to iterate/etc, ho

Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM/BPF proposal]: Physr discussion

2023-01-23 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 12:50:52PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote: > Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 11:36:51AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote: > > > Jason Gunthorpe via Lsf-pc wrote: > > > > I would like to have a session at LSF to talk about Matthew's > > > > physr discussion starter: > >

Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM/BPF proposal]: Physr discussion

2023-01-23 Thread Dan Williams
Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 11:36:51AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote: > > Jason Gunthorpe via Lsf-pc wrote: > > > I would like to have a session at LSF to talk about Matthew's > > > physr discussion starter: > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/ydykweu0htv8m...@casper.infr

Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM/BPF proposal]: Physr discussion

2023-01-23 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 11:36:51AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote: > Jason Gunthorpe via Lsf-pc wrote: > > I would like to have a session at LSF to talk about Matthew's > > physr discussion starter: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/ydykweu0htv8m...@casper.infradead.org/ > > > > I have become

Re: [LSF/MM/BPF proposal]: Physr discussion

2023-01-23 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 1/23/23 05:44, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: I've gone from quite a different starting point - I've been working DMA API upwards, so what does the dma_map_XX look like, what APIs do we need to support the dma_map_ops implementations to iterate/etc, how do we form and return the dma mapped list, how d

RE: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM/BPF proposal]: Physr discussion

2023-01-23 Thread Dan Williams
Jason Gunthorpe via Lsf-pc wrote: > I would like to have a session at LSF to talk about Matthew's > physr discussion starter: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/ydykweu0htv8m...@casper.infradead.org/ > > I have become interested in this with some immediacy because of > IOMMUFD and this other d

Re: [LSF/MM/BPF proposal]: Physr discussion

2023-01-23 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 04:36:25AM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > I've been working on an implementation and hope to have something > > draft to show on the lists in a few weeks. It is pretty clear there > > are several interesting decisions to make that I think will benefit > > from a live disc

Re: [LSF/MM/BPF proposal]: Physr discussion

2023-01-22 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 11:03:05AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > I would like to have a session at LSF to talk about Matthew's > physr discussion starter: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/ydykweu0htv8m...@casper.infradead.org/ I'm definitely interested in discussing phyrs (even if you'd ra

[LSF/MM/BPF proposal]: Physr discussion

2023-01-21 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
I would like to have a session at LSF to talk about Matthew's physr discussion starter: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/ydykweu0htv8m...@casper.infradead.org/ I have become interested in this with some immediacy because of IOMMUFD and this other discussion with Christoph: https://lore.kernel.