Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.sem...@ti.com schreef:
> From: Sumit Semwal
>
> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
> about the dma-buf buffers.
>
I like the idea, I don't know if it could be done in a free manner, but for
bonus points
could we also have the dma-buf fd be ob
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Maarten Lankhorst
wrote:
> Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.sem...@ti.com schreef:
>> From: Sumit Semwal
>>
>> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
>> about the dma-buf buffers.
>>
> I like the idea, I don't know if it could be done in a free m
Op 14-12-12 15:11, Rob Clark schreef:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Maarten Lankhorst
> wrote:
>> Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.sem...@ti.com schreef:
>>> From: Sumit Semwal
>>>
>>> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
>>> about the dma-buf buffers.
>>>
>> I like the i
Hi,
On 12/14/2012 10:36 AM, sumit.sem...@ti.com wrote:
> From: Sumit Semwal
>
> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
> about the dma-buf buffers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal
> ---
> drivers/base/dma-buf.c | 149
> +
Hi Maarten,
On 14 December 2012 17:27, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.sem...@ti.com schreef:
> > From: Sumit Semwal
> >
> > Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
> > about the dma-buf buffers.
> >
> I like the idea, I don't know if it could be done
On 17 December 2012 14:25, Sumit Semwal wrote:
Apologies for re-sending, since the gmail ui 'decided' to set some
formatting options by default!
> Hi Maarten,
>
> On 14 December 2012 17:27, Maarten Lankhorst
> wrote:
>>
>> Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.sem...@ti.com schreef:
>> > From: Sumit Semwal
>
Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.sem...@ti.com schreef:
> From: Sumit Semwal
>
> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
> about the dma-buf buffers.
>
I like the idea, I don't know if it could be done in a free manner, but for
bonus points
could we also have the dma-buf fd be ob
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Maarten Lankhorst
wrote:
> Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.sem...@ti.com schreef:
>> From: Sumit Semwal
>>
>> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
>> about the dma-buf buffers.
>>
> I like the idea, I don't know if it could be done in a free m
Op 14-12-12 15:11, Rob Clark schreef:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Maarten Lankhorst
> wrote:
>> Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.sem...@ti.com schreef:
>>> From: Sumit Semwal
>>>
>>> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
>>> about the dma-buf buffers.
>>>
>> I like the i
Hi,
On 12/14/2012 10:36 AM, sumit.sem...@ti.com wrote:
> From: Sumit Semwal
>
> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
> about the dma-buf buffers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal
> ---
> drivers/base/dma-buf.c | 149
> +
Hi Maarten,
On 14 December 2012 17:27, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.sem...@ti.com schreef:
> > From: Sumit Semwal
> >
> > Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
> > about the dma-buf buffers.
> >
> I like the idea, I don't know if it could be done
On 17 December 2012 14:25, Sumit Semwal wrote:
Apologies for re-sending, since the gmail ui 'decided' to set some
formatting options by default!
> Hi Maarten,
>
> On 14 December 2012 17:27, Maarten Lankhorst
> wrote:
>>
>> Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.sem...@ti.com schreef:
>> > From: Sumit Semwal
>
Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.sem...@ti.com schreef:
> From: Sumit Semwal
>
> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
> about the dma-buf buffers.
>
I like the idea, I don't know if it could be done in a free manner, but for
bonus points
could we also have the dma-buf fd be ob
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Maarten Lankhorst
wrote:
> Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.sem...@ti.com schreef:
>> From: Sumit Semwal
>>
>> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
>> about the dma-buf buffers.
>>
> I like the idea, I don't know if it could be done in a free m
Op 14-12-12 15:11, Rob Clark schreef:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Maarten Lankhorst
> wrote:
>> Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.sem...@ti.com schreef:
>>> From: Sumit Semwal
>>>
>>> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
>>> about the dma-buf buffers.
>>>
>> I like the i
Hi,
On 12/14/2012 10:36 AM, sumit.sem...@ti.com wrote:
> From: Sumit Semwal
>
> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
> about the dma-buf buffers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal
> ---
> drivers/base/dma-buf.c | 149
> +
Hi Maarten,
On 14 December 2012 17:27, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.sem...@ti.com schreef:
> > From: Sumit Semwal
> >
> > Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
> > about the dma-buf buffers.
> >
> I like the idea, I don't know if it could be done
On 17 December 2012 14:25, Sumit Semwal wrote:
Apologies for re-sending, since the gmail ui 'decided' to set some
formatting options by default!
> Hi Maarten,
>
> On 14 December 2012 17:27, Maarten Lankhorst
> wrote:
>>
>> Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.sem...@ti.com schreef:
>> > From: Sumit Semwal
>
Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.sem...@ti.com schreef:
> From: Sumit Semwal
>
> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
> about the dma-buf buffers.
>
I like the idea, I don't know if it could be done in a free manner, but for
bonus points
could we also have the dma-buf fd be ob
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Maarten Lankhorst
wrote:
> Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.sem...@ti.com schreef:
>> From: Sumit Semwal
>>
>> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
>> about the dma-buf buffers.
>>
> I like the idea, I don't know if it could be done in a free m
Op 14-12-12 15:11, Rob Clark schreef:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Maarten Lankhorst
> wrote:
>> Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.sem...@ti.com schreef:
>>> From: Sumit Semwal
>>>
>>> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
>>> about the dma-buf buffers.
>>>
>> I like the i
Hi,
On 12/14/2012 10:36 AM, sumit.sem...@ti.com wrote:
> From: Sumit Semwal
>
> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
> about the dma-buf buffers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal
> ---
> drivers/base/dma-buf.c | 149
> +
Hi Maarten,
On 14 December 2012 17:27, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.sem...@ti.com schreef:
> > From: Sumit Semwal
> >
> > Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
> > about the dma-buf buffers.
> >
> I like the idea, I don't know if it could be done
On 17 December 2012 14:25, Sumit Semwal wrote:
Apologies for re-sending, since the gmail ui 'decided' to set some
formatting options by default!
> Hi Maarten,
>
> On 14 December 2012 17:27, Maarten Lankhorst
> wrote:
>>
>> Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.sem...@ti.com schreef:
>> > From: Sumit Semwal
>
Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.sem...@ti.com schreef:
> From: Sumit Semwal
>
> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
> about the dma-buf buffers.
>
I like the idea, I don't know if it could be done in a free manner, but for
bonus points
could we also have the dma-buf fd be ob
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Maarten Lankhorst
wrote:
> Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.sem...@ti.com schreef:
>> From: Sumit Semwal
>>
>> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
>> about the dma-buf buffers.
>>
> I like the idea, I don't know if it could be done in a free m
Op 14-12-12 15:11, Rob Clark schreef:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Maarten Lankhorst
> wrote:
>> Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.sem...@ti.com schreef:
>>> From: Sumit Semwal
>>>
>>> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
>>> about the dma-buf buffers.
>>>
>> I like the i
Hi,
On 12/14/2012 10:36 AM, sumit.sem...@ti.com wrote:
> From: Sumit Semwal
>
> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
> about the dma-buf buffers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal
> ---
> drivers/base/dma-buf.c | 149
> +
Hi Maarten,
On 14 December 2012 17:27, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.sem...@ti.com schreef:
> > From: Sumit Semwal
> >
> > Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
> > about the dma-buf buffers.
> >
> I like the idea, I don't know if it could be done
On 17 December 2012 14:25, Sumit Semwal wrote:
Apologies for re-sending, since the gmail ui 'decided' to set some
formatting options by default!
> Hi Maarten,
>
> On 14 December 2012 17:27, Maarten Lankhorst
> wrote:
>>
>> Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.sem...@ti.com schreef:
>> > From: Sumit Semwal
>
Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.sem...@ti.com schreef:
> From: Sumit Semwal
>
> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
> about the dma-buf buffers.
>
I like the idea, I don't know if it could be done in a free manner, but for
bonus points
could we also have the dma-buf fd be ob
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Maarten Lankhorst
wrote:
> Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.sem...@ti.com schreef:
>> From: Sumit Semwal
>>
>> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
>> about the dma-buf buffers.
>>
> I like the idea, I don't know if it could be done in a free m
Op 14-12-12 15:11, Rob Clark schreef:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Maarten Lankhorst
> wrote:
>> Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.sem...@ti.com schreef:
>>> From: Sumit Semwal
>>>
>>> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
>>> about the dma-buf buffers.
>>>
>> I like the i
Hi,
On 12/14/2012 10:36 AM, sumit.sem...@ti.com wrote:
> From: Sumit Semwal
>
> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
> about the dma-buf buffers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal
> ---
> drivers/base/dma-buf.c | 149
> +
Hi Maarten,
On 14 December 2012 17:27, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.sem...@ti.com schreef:
> > From: Sumit Semwal
> >
> > Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
> > about the dma-buf buffers.
> >
> I like the idea, I don't know if it could be done
On 17 December 2012 14:25, Sumit Semwal wrote:
Apologies for re-sending, since the gmail ui 'decided' to set some
formatting options by default!
> Hi Maarten,
>
> On 14 December 2012 17:27, Maarten Lankhorst
> wrote:
>>
>> Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.sem...@ti.com schreef:
>> > From: Sumit Semwal
>
36 matches
Mail list logo
