On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 06:51:15AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Darren Etheridge
> wrote:
> > Guido,
> >
> >
> > On 06/17/2014 09:17 AM, Guido Mart?nez wrote:
> >>
> >> The tilcdc driver could be compiled as a module, but was severely broken
> >> and could not be
On 3 July 2014 06:38, Ezequiel Garc?a wrote:
> On 02 Jul 02:08 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> On 2 July 2014 12:31, Darren Etheridge wrote:
>> > On 07/01/2014 06:39 PM, Guido Mart?nez wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 05:08:51PM -0500, Darren Etheridge wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> [snip]
>> >>>
>>
On 02 Jul 02:08 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On 2 July 2014 12:31, Darren Etheridge wrote:
> > On 07/01/2014 06:39 PM, Guido Mart?nez wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 05:08:51PM -0500, Darren Etheridge wrote:
> >>>
> >>> [snip]
> >>>
> >>> Otherwise I think this is a good and useful patch
On 2 July 2014 12:31, Darren Etheridge wrote:
> On 07/01/2014 06:39 PM, Guido Mart?nez wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 05:08:51PM -0500, Darren Etheridge wrote:
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>> Otherwise I think this is a good and useful patch series.
>>
>> It that a Tested-by tag? :)
>
>
> Sure - I
On 07/01/2014 06:39 PM, Guido Mart?nez wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 05:08:51PM -0500, Darren Etheridge wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
>> Otherwise I think this is a good and useful patch series.
> It that a Tested-by tag? :)
Sure - I would prefer that the WARN_ON was silenced when the tilcdc
module is
Hi Dave,
did you take a look at this patchset? I foolishly missed adding you on
the To: header, so apologies for that in advance.
Thanks,
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:17:02AM -0300, Guido Mart?nez wrote:
> The tilcdc driver could be compiled as a module, but was severely broken
> and could not be
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 05:08:51PM -0500, Darren Etheridge wrote:
> [snip]
>
> Otherwise I think this is a good and useful patch series.
It that a Tested-by tag? :)
Thanks!
Guido
>
> Darren
>
> >The first 7 patches are bug fixes which and should probably be applied
> >in the stable trees. The
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Darren Etheridge wrote:
> Guido,
>
>
> On 06/17/2014 09:17 AM, Guido Mart?nez wrote:
>>
>> The tilcdc driver could be compiled as a module, but was severely broken
>> and could not be used as such. This patchset attempts to fix the issues
>> preventing a proper
Guido,
On 06/17/2014 09:17 AM, Guido Mart?nez wrote:
> The tilcdc driver could be compiled as a module, but was severely broken
> and could not be used as such. This patchset attempts to fix the issues
> preventing a proper load/unload of the module.
>
> Issues included dangling sysfs nodes,
Hi Rob,
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:17:02AM -0300, Guido Mart?nez wrote:
> The tilcdc driver could be compiled as a module, but was severely broken
> and could not be used as such. This patchset attempts to fix the issues
> preventing a proper load/unload of the module.
>
> Issues included
Hi Darren,
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 08:41:43AM -0500, Darren Etheridge wrote:
> Guido,
>
> Thanks and sorry I missed this the first time around. I'll give it a try on
> a few of my AM335x based boards when I have access to them again on Monday.
Thanks! And no worries :)
>
> Darren
>
--
Guido
Guido,
Thanks and sorry I missed this the first time around. I'll give it a
try on a few of my AM335x based boards when I have access to them again
on Monday.
Darren
On 06/17/2014 09:17 AM, Guido Mart?nez wrote:
> The tilcdc driver could be compiled as a module, but was severely broken
> and
The tilcdc driver could be compiled as a module, but was severely broken
and could not be used as such. This patchset attempts to fix the issues
preventing a proper load/unload of the module.
Issues included dangling sysfs nodes, dangling devices, memory leaks and
a double kfree.
It now seems to
13 matches
Mail list logo
