On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 2:42 PM Christian König
wrote:
>
> Am 23.06.21 um 13:30 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 1:17 PM Christian König
> > wrote:
> >> Am 22.06.21 um 19:02 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> >>> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 3:07 PM Christian König
> >>> wrote:
> Crap,
Am 23.06.21 um 13:30 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 1:17 PM Christian König
wrote:
Am 22.06.21 um 19:02 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 3:07 PM Christian König
wrote:
Crap, hit enter to early before adding a cover letter.
This is the same patch as before, but
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 1:17 PM Christian König
wrote:
>
> Am 22.06.21 um 19:02 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 3:07 PM Christian König
> > wrote:
> >> Crap, hit enter to early before adding a cover letter.
> >>
> >> This is the same patch as before, but as requested I'm
Am 22.06.21 um 19:02 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 3:07 PM Christian König
wrote:
Crap, hit enter to early before adding a cover letter.
This is the same patch as before, but as requested I'm keeping the
exclusive fence handling as it is for now.
Daniel can you double check
Hi "Christian,
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Christian-K-nig/dma-buf-fix-and-rework-dma_buf_poll-v3/20210622-210643
base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/tegra/linux.git drm/tegra/for-next
config: i386-randconfig-m021-20210622 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 3:07 PM Christian König
wrote:
>
> Crap, hit enter to early before adding a cover letter.
>
> This is the same patch as before, but as requested I'm keeping the
> exclusive fence handling as it is for now.
>
> Daniel can you double check this and/or make sure that it is
Crap, hit enter to early before adding a cover letter.
This is the same patch as before, but as requested I'm keeping the
exclusive fence handling as it is for now.
Daniel can you double check this and/or make sure that it is tested?
I only smoke tested it and the code is so complicated that
Daniel pointed me towards this function and there are multiple obvious problems
in the implementation.
First of all the retry loop is not working as intended. In general the retry
makes only sense if you grab the reference first and then check the sequence
values.
It's also good practice to keep
