Am 30.06.23 um 19:19 schrieb Luben Tuikov:
On 2023-06-30 08:00, Christian König wrote:
[SNIP]
---
Silly question perhaps:
Could we not have returned an existing (signalled) fence with
the wanted timestamp (when count == 0), as opposed to allocating a stub? Maybe
allocation should be
On 2023-06-30 08:00, Christian König wrote:
> Some Android CTS is testing if the signaling time keeps consistent
> during merges.
>
> v2: use the current time if the fence is still in the signaling path and
> the timestamp not yet available.
> v3: improve comment, fix one more case to use the
Some Android CTS is testing if the signaling time keeps consistent
during merges.
v2: use the current time if the fence is still in the signaling path and
the timestamp not yet available.
v3: improve comment, fix one more case to use the correct timestamp
Signed-off-by: Christian König
---
