On 09/06/2023 13:52, Christian König wrote:
Am 09.06.23 um 14:09 schrieb Tvrtko Ursulin:
On 09/06/2023 07:32, Christian König wrote:
Am 08.06.23 um 16:30 schrieb Tvrtko Ursulin:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
For dma_fence_is_signaled signaling critical path annotations are an
annoying cause of
Am 09.06.23 um 14:09 schrieb Tvrtko Ursulin:
On 09/06/2023 07:32, Christian König wrote:
Am 08.06.23 um 16:30 schrieb Tvrtko Ursulin:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
For dma_fence_is_signaled signaling critical path annotations are an
annoying cause of false positives when using dma_fence_is_signaled
On 09/06/2023 07:32, Christian König wrote:
Am 08.06.23 um 16:30 schrieb Tvrtko Ursulin:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
For dma_fence_is_signaled signaling critical path annotations are an
annoying cause of false positives when using dma_fence_is_signaled and
indirectly higher level helpers such as
Am 08.06.23 um 16:30 schrieb Tvrtko Ursulin:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
For dma_fence_is_signaled signaling critical path annotations are an
annoying cause of false positives when using dma_fence_is_signaled and
indirectly higher level helpers such as dma_resv_test_signaled etc.
Drop the critical
://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc drm-misc-next
patch link:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230608143059.1038115-1-tvrtko.ursulin%40linux.intel.com
patch subject: [PATCH] dma-fence: Bypass signaling annotation from
dma_fence_is_signaled
config: arm-buildonly-randconfig-r006-20230608
(https://download.01.org/0day
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
For dma_fence_is_signaled signaling critical path annotations are an
annoying cause of false positives when using dma_fence_is_signaled and
indirectly higher level helpers such as dma_resv_test_signaled etc.
Drop the critical path annotation since the "is signaled" API does