Re: [PATCH] drm/atomic: Check new_crtc_state->active to determine if CRTC needs disable in self refresh mode

2022-01-11 Thread Alex Deucher
Pushed out to drm-misc-next-fixes. Alex On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 9:07 PM Liu Ying wrote: > > On Fri, 2022-01-07 at 14:53 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 11:07 PM Liu Ying wrote: > > > > > > Actual hardware state of CRTC is controlled by the member 'active' > > > in > > > st

Re: [PATCH] drm/atomic: Check new_crtc_state->active to determine if CRTC needs disable in self refresh mode

2022-01-07 Thread Liu Ying
On Fri, 2022-01-07 at 14:53 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 11:07 PM Liu Ying wrote: > > > > Actual hardware state of CRTC is controlled by the member 'active' > > in > > struct drm_crtc_state instead of the member 'enable', according to > > the > > kernel doc of the member '

Re: [PATCH] drm/atomic: Check new_crtc_state->active to determine if CRTC needs disable in self refresh mode

2022-01-07 Thread Alex Deucher
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 11:07 PM Liu Ying wrote: > > Actual hardware state of CRTC is controlled by the member 'active' in > struct drm_crtc_state instead of the member 'enable', according to the > kernel doc of the member 'enable'. In fact, the drm client modeset > and atomic helpers are using t

[PATCH] drm/atomic: Check new_crtc_state->active to determine if CRTC needs disable in self refresh mode

2021-12-29 Thread Liu Ying
Actual hardware state of CRTC is controlled by the member 'active' in struct drm_crtc_state instead of the member 'enable', according to the kernel doc of the member 'enable'. In fact, the drm client modeset and atomic helpers are using the member 'active' to do the control. Referencing the membe