Re: [PATCH] drm/atomic: clarify the rules around drm_atomic_state->allow_modeset

2023-10-11 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 11:20:51 +0200 Daniel Vetter wrote: > msm is automagically upgrading normal commits to full modesets, and > that's a big no-no: > > - for one this results in full on->off->on transitions on all these > crtc, at least if you're using the usual helpers. Which seems to be >

Re: [PATCH] drm/atomic: clarify the rules around drm_atomic_state->allow_modeset

2023-10-11 Thread Thomas Zimmermann
Hi Am 11.10.23 um 11:20 schrieb Daniel Vetter: msm is automagically upgrading normal commits to full modesets, and Can you give context or pointers here? that's a big no-no: - for one this results in full on->off->on transitions on all these crtc, at least if you're using the usual

[PATCH] drm/atomic: clarify the rules around drm_atomic_state->allow_modeset

2023-10-11 Thread Daniel Vetter
msm is automagically upgrading normal commits to full modesets, and that's a big no-no: - for one this results in full on->off->on transitions on all these crtc, at least if you're using the usual helpers. Which seems to be the case, and is breaking uapi - further even if the ctm change

[PATCH] drm/atomic: clarify the rules around drm_atomic_state->allow_modeset

2023-10-10 Thread Daniel Vetter
msm is automagically upgrading normal commits to full modesets, and that's a big no-no: - for one this results in full on->off->on transitions on all these crtc, at least if you're using the usual helpers. Which seems to be the case, and is breaking uapi - further even if the ctm change