Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Implement wait_hpd_asserted

2023-04-20 Thread Doug Anderson
Hi, On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 12:10 PM Doug Anderson wrote: > > Hi, > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 9:19 PM Nikita Travkin wrote: > > > > Doug Anderson писал(а) 13.04.2023 01:22: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 1:20 AM Nikita Travkin wrote: > > >> > > >> This bridge doesn't actually

Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Implement wait_hpd_asserted

2023-04-13 Thread Doug Anderson
Hi, On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 9:19 PM Nikita Travkin wrote: > > Doug Anderson писал(а) 13.04.2023 01:22: > > Hi, > > > > On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 1:20 AM Nikita Travkin wrote: > >> > >> This bridge doesn't actually implement HPD due to it being way too slow > >> but instead expects the panel driver

Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Implement wait_hpd_asserted

2023-04-13 Thread Nikita Travkin
Doug Anderson писал(а) 13.04.2023 01:22: > Hi, > > On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 1:20 AM Nikita Travkin wrote: >> >> This bridge doesn't actually implement HPD due to it being way too slow >> but instead expects the panel driver to wait enough to assume HPD is >> asserted. However some panels (such as

Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Implement wait_hpd_asserted

2023-04-12 Thread Doug Anderson
Hi, On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 1:20 AM Nikita Travkin wrote: > > This bridge doesn't actually implement HPD due to it being way too slow > but instead expects the panel driver to wait enough to assume HPD is > asserted. However some panels (such as the generic 'edp-panel') expect > the bridge to

[PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Implement wait_hpd_asserted

2023-04-08 Thread Nikita Travkin
This bridge doesn't actually implement HPD due to it being way too slow but instead expects the panel driver to wait enough to assume HPD is asserted. However some panels (such as the generic 'edp-panel') expect the bridge to deal with the delay and pass maximum delay to the aux instead. In order