On Thu, 2017-09-28 at 10:29 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Liviu Dudau
> wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 09:40:35AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Steven Price >
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 09:40:35AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Steven Price wrote:
>> > From: Tu Vuong
>> >
>> > When a CMA GEM
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 09:40:35AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Steven Price wrote:
> > From: Tu Vuong
> >
> > When a CMA GEM object is exported via DRM PRIME it should be possible
> > to mmap the object using
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Steven Price wrote:
> From: Tu Vuong
>
> When a CMA GEM object is exported via DRM PRIME it should be possible
> to mmap the object using an offset. However drm_gem_cma_mmap_obj always
> zeroed vm_pgoff.
No, at least no
From: Tu Vuong
When a CMA GEM object is exported via DRM PRIME it should be possible
to mmap the object using an offset. However drm_gem_cma_mmap_obj always
zeroed vm_pgoff.
Fix this by moving the zeroing of vm_pgoff to drm_gem_cma_mmap (which
is only used for non-PRIME mmap)