Re: [PATCH] drm/display/dsc: Refactor MST DSC Determination Policy

2024-09-25 Thread Dan Carpenter
://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel for-linux-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240919173944.256887-1-Jerry.Zuo%40amd.com patch subject: [PATCH] drm/display/dsc: Refactor MST DSC Determination Policy config: microblaze-randconfig-r071-20240922 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240923

Re: [PATCH] drm/display/dsc: Refactor MST DSC Determination Policy

2024-09-20 Thread Harry Wentland
On 2024-09-20 01:56, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 19 Sep 2024, Fangzhi Zuo wrote: >> [why] >> How we determine the dsc_aux used for dsc decompression in >> drm_dp_mst_dsc_aux_for_port() today having some defects: >> >> 1. The method how we determine a connected peer device is virtual or not >>

Re: [PATCH] drm/display/dsc: Refactor MST DSC Determination Policy

2024-09-19 Thread Jani Nikula
On Thu, 19 Sep 2024, Fangzhi Zuo wrote: > [why] > How we determine the dsc_aux used for dsc decompression in > drm_dp_mst_dsc_aux_for_port() today having some defects: > > 1. The method how we determine a connected peer device is virtual or not >in drm_dp_mst_is_virtual_dpcd() is not always co

[PATCH] drm/display/dsc: Refactor MST DSC Determination Policy

2024-09-19 Thread Fangzhi Zuo
[why] How we determine the dsc_aux used for dsc decompression in drm_dp_mst_dsc_aux_for_port() today having some defects: 1. The method how we determine a connected peer device is virtual or not in drm_dp_mst_is_virtual_dpcd() is not always correct. There are DP1.4 products in the market wh