On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 02:15:11PM -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 23:29 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 01:07:49PM -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> > > The Write_Status_Update_Request I2C transaction requires the MOT
> > > bit to
> > > be set, C
On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 23:29 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 01:07:49PM -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> > The Write_Status_Update_Request I2C transaction requires the MOT
> > bit to
> > be set, Change the logical AND to OR to fix what looks like a typo.
>
> It's not a type
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:29:06PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 01:07:49PM -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> > The Write_Status_Update_Request I2C transaction requires the MOT bit to
> > be set, Change the logical AND to OR to fix what looks like a typo.
>
> It's not a t
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 01:07:49PM -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> The Write_Status_Update_Request I2C transaction requires the MOT bit to
> be set, Change the logical AND to OR to fix what looks like a typo.
It's not a type. We're just preserving MOT. What makes you think it
should always be
The Write_Status_Update_Request I2C transaction requires the MOT bit to
be set, Change the logical AND to OR to fix what looks like a typo.
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Jani Nikula
Cc: Ville Syrjälä
Fixes: 68ec2a2a2481 ("drm/dp: Use I2C_WRITE_STATUS_UPDATE to drain partial
I2C_WRITE
