[PATCH] drm/exynos: fix multiple definition build error

2013-04-28 Thread Inki Dae
2013/4/27 Sylwester Nawrocki > On 04/26/2013 09:42 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote: > >> On Friday 26 of April 2013 11:48:50 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: >> >>> On 04/26/2013 10:20 AM, Inki Dae wrote: >>> Exactly right. it's my mistake. But now it seems that __mode_of_device_table is multi defined

[PATCH] drm/exynos: fix multiple definition build error

2013-04-28 Thread Inki Dae
2013/4/27 Tomasz Figa > On Friday 26 of April 2013 11:48:50 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > > On 04/26/2013 10:20 AM, Inki Dae wrote: > > > Exactly right. it's my mistake. But now it seems that > > > __mode_of_device_table is multi defined at fimd and g2d side so there > > > still is module build

Re: [PATCH] drm/exynos: fix multiple definition build error

2013-04-28 Thread Inki Dae
2013/4/27 Tomasz Figa tomasz.f...@gmail.com On Friday 26 of April 2013 11:48:50 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: On 04/26/2013 10:20 AM, Inki Dae wrote: Exactly right. it's my mistake. But now it seems that __mode_of_device_table is multi defined at fimd and g2d side so there still is module

Re: [PATCH] drm/exynos: fix multiple definition build error

2013-04-28 Thread Inki Dae
2013/4/27 Sylwester Nawrocki sylvester.nawro...@gmail.com On 04/26/2013 09:42 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote: On Friday 26 of April 2013 11:48:50 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: On 04/26/2013 10:20 AM, Inki Dae wrote: Exactly right. it's my mistake. But now it seems that __mode_of_device_table is multi

Re: [PATCH] drm/exynos: fix multiple definition build error

2013-04-27 Thread Sylwester Nawrocki
On 04/26/2013 09:42 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote: On Friday 26 of April 2013 11:48:50 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: On 04/26/2013 10:20 AM, Inki Dae wrote: Exactly right. it's my mistake. But now it seems that __mode_of_device_table is multi defined at fimd and g2d side so there still is module build

[PATCH] drm/exynos: fix multiple definition build error

2013-04-26 Thread Sylwester Nawrocki
On 04/26/2013 09:42 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote: > On Friday 26 of April 2013 11:48:50 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: >> On 04/26/2013 10:20 AM, Inki Dae wrote: >>> Exactly right. it's my mistake. But now it seems that >>> __mode_of_device_table is multi defined at fimd and g2d side so there >>> still is

[PATCH] drm/exynos: fix multiple definition build error

2013-04-26 Thread Tomasz Figa
On Friday 26 of April 2013 11:48:50 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > On 04/26/2013 10:20 AM, Inki Dae wrote: > > Exactly right. it's my mistake. But now it seems that > > __mode_of_device_table is multi defined at fimd and g2d side so there > > still is module build error. :( > Since all drivers seem

[PATCH] drm/exynos: fix multiple definition build error

2013-04-26 Thread Inki Dae
Hi Tomasz, 2013/4/26 Tomasz Figa > Hi Inki, > > On Friday 26 of April 2013 14:03:10 Inki Dae wrote: > > This patch fixes multiple definition error like below when building it > > as moudle with device tree support. > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.o: In function `.LANCHOR1': > >

[PATCH] drm/exynos: fix multiple definition build error

2013-04-26 Thread Sylwester Nawrocki
On 04/26/2013 10:20 AM, Inki Dae wrote: > Exactly right. it's my mistake. But now it seems that __mode_of_device_table > is > multi defined at fimd and g2d side so there still is module build error. :( Since all drivers seem to be linked into single a single module, you likely need to create a

[PATCH] drm/exynos: fix multiple definition build error

2013-04-26 Thread Tomasz Figa
Hi Inki, On Friday 26 of April 2013 14:03:10 Inki Dae wrote: > This patch fixes multiple definition error like below when building it > as moudle with device tree support. > > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.o: In function `.LANCHOR1': > exynos_drm_g2d.c:(.rodata+0x6c): multiple definition

Re: [PATCH] drm/exynos: fix multiple definition build error

2013-04-26 Thread Tomasz Figa
Hi Inki, On Friday 26 of April 2013 14:03:10 Inki Dae wrote: This patch fixes multiple definition error like below when building it as moudle with device tree support. drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.o: In function `.LANCHOR1': exynos_drm_g2d.c:(.rodata+0x6c): multiple definition of

Re: [PATCH] drm/exynos: fix multiple definition build error

2013-04-26 Thread Inki Dae
Hi Tomasz, 2013/4/26 Tomasz Figa tomasz.f...@gmail.com Hi Inki, On Friday 26 of April 2013 14:03:10 Inki Dae wrote: This patch fixes multiple definition error like below when building it as moudle with device tree support. drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.o: In function

Re: [PATCH] drm/exynos: fix multiple definition build error

2013-04-26 Thread Sylwester Nawrocki
On 04/26/2013 10:20 AM, Inki Dae wrote: Exactly right. it's my mistake. But now it seems that __mode_of_device_table is multi defined at fimd and g2d side so there still is module build error. :( Since all drivers seem to be linked into single a single module, you likely need to create a

Re: [PATCH] drm/exynos: fix multiple definition build error

2013-04-26 Thread Tomasz Figa
On Friday 26 of April 2013 11:48:50 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: On 04/26/2013 10:20 AM, Inki Dae wrote: Exactly right. it's my mistake. But now it seems that __mode_of_device_table is multi defined at fimd and g2d side so there still is module build error. :( Since all drivers seem to be

[PATCH] drm/exynos: fix multiple definition build error

2013-04-25 Thread Inki Dae
This patch fixes multiple definition error like below when building it as moudle with device tree support. drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.o: In function `.LANCHOR1': exynos_drm_g2d.c:(.rodata+0x6c): multiple definition of `__mod_of_device_table'