[PATCH] drm/gma500: dont expose bytes from kernel stack

2016-08-23 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Heinrich, [auto build test ERROR on drm/drm-next] [also build test ERROR on v4.8-rc3 next-20160822] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] [Suggest to use git(>=2.9.0) format-patch --base= (or --base=auto for convenience) to record

[PATCH] drm/gma500: dont expose bytes from kernel stack

2016-08-22 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Heinrich, [auto build test ERROR on drm/drm-next] [also build test ERROR on v4.8-rc3 next-20160822] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] [Suggest to use git(>=2.9.0) format-patch --base= (or --base=auto for convenience) to record

[PATCH] drm/gma500: dont expose bytes from kernel stack

2016-08-22 Thread Jani Nikula
On Sun, 21 Aug 2016, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > Components m1, m2, p2, dot, vco of variable clock should be > initialized to avoid bytes from the kernel stack to be > exposed. > > Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/oaktrail_crtc.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1

[PATCH] drm/gma500: dont expose bytes from kernel stack

2016-08-22 Thread One Thousand Gnomes
On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 09:29:17 +0200 Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 08:39:38PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > Components m1, m2, p2, dot, vco of variable clock should be > > initialized to avoid bytes from the kernel stack to be > > exposed. > > > > Signed-off-by: Heinrich

[PATCH] drm/gma500: dont expose bytes from kernel stack

2016-08-22 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 08:39:38PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > Components m1, m2, p2, dot, vco of variable clock should be > initialized to avoid bytes from the kernel stack to be > exposed. > > Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt Might be a silly question, but where exactly would we

[PATCH] drm/gma500: dont expose bytes from kernel stack

2016-08-21 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
On 08/21/2016 08:46 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > On Sun, 2016-08-21 at 20:39 +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: >> Components m1, m2, p2, dot, vco of variable clock should be >> initialized to avoid bytes from the kernel stack to be >> exposed. > > How was this found? visual code inspection? cppcheck

[PATCH] drm/gma500: dont expose bytes from kernel stack

2016-08-21 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
Components m1, m2, p2, dot, vco of variable clock should be initialized to avoid bytes from the kernel stack to be exposed. Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt --- drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/oaktrail_crtc.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/oaktrail_crtc.c

[PATCH] drm/gma500: dont expose bytes from kernel stack

2016-08-21 Thread Joe Perches
On Sun, 2016-08-21 at 21:35 +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > On 08/21/2016 08:46 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Sun, 2016-08-21 at 20:39 +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > > Components m1, m2, p2, dot, vco of variable clock should be > > > initialized to avoid bytes from the kernel stack to

[PATCH] drm/gma500: dont expose bytes from kernel stack

2016-08-21 Thread Joe Perches
On Sun, 2016-08-21 at 20:39 +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > Components m1, m2, p2, dot, vco of variable clock should be > initialized to avoid bytes from the kernel stack to be > exposed. How was this found? visual code inspection? And isn't this true for mrst_lvds_find_best_pll as well? >