On 5 April 2016 at 11:54, Ezequiel Garcia
wrote:
> (Adding Jani again, who got dropped for some reason)
>
> On 1 April 2016 at 16:50, Ezequiel Garcia
> wrote:
>> On 01 Apr 06:46 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 12:38:11PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>>> > El abr. 1,
(Adding Jani again, who got dropped for some reason)
On 1 April 2016 at 16:50, Ezequiel Garcia
wrote:
> On 01 Apr 06:46 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 12:38:11PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>> > El abr. 1, 2016 11:47 AM, "Ville Syrjälä" > > linux.intel.com>
>> >
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 12:38:11PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> El abr. 1, 2016 11:47 AM, "Ville Syrjälä"
> escribió:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 05:55:03PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > > Currently, our implementation of drm_connector_funcs.detect is
> > > based on getting a valid
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 05:55:03PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> Currently, our implementation of drm_connector_funcs.detect is
> based on getting a valid EDID.
>
> This requirement makes the driver fail to detect connected
> connectors in case of EDID corruption, which prevents from falling
>
On 01 Apr 06:46 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 12:38:11PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > El abr. 1, 2016 11:47 AM, "Ville Syrjälä" > linux.intel.com>
> > escribió:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 05:55:03PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > > > Currently, our
El abr. 1, 2016 11:47 AM, "Ville Syrjälä"
escribió:
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 05:55:03PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > Currently, our implementation of drm_connector_funcs.detect is
> > based on getting a valid EDID.
> >
> > This requirement makes the driver fail to detect connected
> >
Currently, our implementation of drm_connector_funcs.detect is
based on getting a valid EDID.
This requirement makes the driver fail to detect connected
connectors in case of EDID corruption, which prevents from falling
back to modes provided by builtin or user-provided EDIDs.
Let's fix this by
