On Thu, 21 Jan 2021, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 9:10 AM Jani Nikula wrote:
>
>> Kinda catch-22 because next has dropped current drm-intel-next because
>> it doesn't build because of the issue this patch fixes. ;)
>
> Ok, so I built drm-intel-next and I was able to reproduce
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 9:10 AM Jani Nikula wrote:
> Kinda catch-22 because next has dropped current drm-intel-next because
> it doesn't build because of the issue this patch fixes. ;)
Ok, so I built drm-intel-next and I was able to reproduce the buid
error as reported by Stephen.
Applied this
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 8:41 AM Jani Nikula wrote:
>
>> On top of what? Current drm-tip?
>
> It was on top of next-20210121.
Kinda catch-22 because next has dropped current drm-intel-next because
it doesn't build because of the issue this patch fixes.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 8:41 AM Jani Nikula wrote:
> On top of what? Current drm-tip?
It was on top of next-20210121.
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Jani,
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 8:22 AM Jani Nikula wrote:
>
>> Sean, Rob, or anyone with an arm toolchain for msm available, could I
>> trouble you to build test this please?
>
> I tried to build after applying your patch:
On top of what?
Hi Jani,
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 8:22 AM Jani Nikula wrote:
> Sean, Rob, or anyone with an arm toolchain for msm available, could I
> trouble you to build test this please?
I tried to build after applying your patch:
CC drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.o
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c:
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021, Lyude Paul wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul
Thanks for the review.
Sean, Rob, or anyone with an arm toolchain for msm available, could I
trouble you to build test this please?
BR,
Jani.
>
> On Wed, 2021-01-20 at 13:07 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Commit 7c553f8b5a7d
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul
On Wed, 2021-01-20 at 13:07 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Commit 7c553f8b5a7d ("drm/dp: Revert "drm/dp: Introduce EDID-based
> quirks"") removed drm_dp_get_edid_quirks() and changed the signature of
> drm_dp_has_quirk() while they were still being used in msm. Fix the
>
Commit 7c553f8b5a7d ("drm/dp: Revert "drm/dp: Introduce EDID-based
quirks"") removed drm_dp_get_edid_quirks() and changed the signature of
drm_dp_has_quirk() while they were still being used in msm. Fix the
breakage. Functionally, removing the EDID-based quirks has no impact on
msm.
[The above
