On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 12:59 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
> From: Rob Clark
>
> Without these, DVI is broken.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
> ---
> Greg, it looks like the omapdss changes which added these fields, as
> well as the interlaced field, where merged in Linux 3.5-rc5. So I
> think both
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Tomi Valkeinen
wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 12:59 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
>> From: Rob Clark
>>
>> Without these, DVI is broken.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
>> ---
>> Greg, it looks like the omapdss changes which added these fields, as
>> well as the
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote:
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 12:59 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
Without these, DVI is broken.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
---
Greg, it looks like the omapdss changes which added these
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 12:59 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
Without these, DVI is broken.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
---
Greg, it looks like the omapdss changes which added these fields, as
well as the interlaced field, where merged in Linux 3.5-rc5. So I
From: Rob Clark
Without these, DVI is broken.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
---
Greg, it looks like the omapdss changes which added these fields, as
well as the interlaced field, where merged in Linux 3.5-rc5. So I
think both this and the 'update for interlaced' patch are needed for
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
Without these, DVI is broken.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
---
Greg, it looks like the omapdss changes which added these fields, as
well as the interlaced field, where merged in Linux 3.5-rc5. So I
think both this and the 'update for interlaced' patch are