On Friday 07 December 2012 04:15 PM, Archit Taneja wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 December 2012 01:29 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> This patch changes the omapdrm KMS to bypass the omapdss "compat"
>> layer and use the core omapdss API directly. This solves some layering
>> issues that would cause unpin
On Wednesday 05 December 2012 01:29 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> This patch changes the omapdrm KMS to bypass the omapdss "compat"
> layer and use the core omapdss API directly. This solves some layering
> issues that would cause unpin confusion vs GO bit status, because we
> would not know whether a
This patch changes the omapdrm KMS to bypass the omapdss "compat"
layer and use the core omapdss API directly. This solves some layering
issues that would cause unpin confusion vs GO bit status, because we
would not know whether a particular pageflip or overlay update has hit
the screen or not.
On 2012-11-16 14:19, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 06:00:58PM -0600, Rob Clark wrote:
>> This patch changes the omapdrm KMS to bypass the omapdss "compat"
>> layer and use the core omapdss API directly. This solves some layering
>> issues that would cause unpin confusion vs GO bit
On 2012-11-16 14:19, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 06:00:58PM -0600, Rob Clark wrote:
This patch changes the omapdrm KMS to bypass the omapdss compat
layer and use the core omapdss API directly. This solves some layering
issues that would cause unpin confusion vs GO bit status,
On Friday 16 November 2012 12:14 PM, Archit Taneja wrote:
> On Friday 16 November 2012 05:30 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
if (!obj)
>> @@ -565,14 +344,6 @@ static int dev_load(struct drm_device *dev,
>> unsigned long flags)
>>
>> dev->dev_private = priv;
>>
>> -ret = omapdss_compat_init();
On Friday 16 November 2012 05:30 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> This patch changes the omapdrm KMS to bypass the omapdss "compat"
> layer and use the core omapdss API directly. This solves some layering
> issues that would cause unpin confusion vs GO bit status, because we
> would not know whether a
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Archit Taneja wrote:
> On Friday 16 November 2012 05:30 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>
>> +static void omap_crtc_set_lcd_config(struct omap_overlay_manager *mgr,
>> + const struct dss_lcd_mgr_config *config)
>> +{
>> + struct omap_crtc *omap_crtc =
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 06:00:58PM -0600, Rob Clark wrote:
> This patch changes the omapdrm KMS to bypass the omapdss "compat"
> layer and use the core omapdss API directly. This solves some layering
> issues that would cause unpin confusion vs GO bit status, because we
> would not know whether a
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 06:00:58PM -0600, Rob Clark wrote:
This patch changes the omapdrm KMS to bypass the omapdss compat
layer and use the core omapdss API directly. This solves some layering
issues that would cause unpin confusion vs GO bit status, because we
would not know whether a
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Archit Taneja arc...@ti.com wrote:
On Friday 16 November 2012 05:30 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
+static void omap_crtc_set_lcd_config(struct omap_overlay_manager *mgr,
+ const struct dss_lcd_mgr_config *config)
+{
+ struct omap_crtc *omap_crtc =
This patch changes the omapdrm KMS to bypass the omapdss "compat"
layer and use the core omapdss API directly. This solves some layering
issues that would cause unpin confusion vs GO bit status, because we
would not know whether a particular pageflip or overlay update has hit
the screen or not.
On Friday 16 November 2012 12:14 PM, Archit Taneja wrote:
On Friday 16 November 2012 05:30 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
if (!obj)
@@ -565,14 +344,6 @@ static int dev_load(struct drm_device *dev,
unsigned long flags)
dev-dev_private = priv;
-ret = omapdss_compat_init();
-if (ret) {
On Friday 16 November 2012 05:30 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
This patch changes the omapdrm KMS to bypass the omapdss compat
layer and use the core omapdss API directly. This solves some layering
issues that would cause unpin confusion vs GO bit status, because we
would not know whether a particular
14 matches
Mail list logo
