This adds a new optional chunk to the CS ioctl that specifies optional flags
to the CS parser. Why this is useful is explained below. Note that some regs
no longer need the NOP relocation packet if this feature is enabled.
Tested on r300g and r600g with this flag disabled and enabled.
Assume there
This adds a new optional chunk to the CS ioctl that specifies optional flags
to the CS parser. Why this is useful is explained below. Note that some regs
no longer need the NOP relocation packet if this feature is enabled.
Tested on r300g and r600g with this flag disabled and enabled.
Assume there
This adds a new optional chunk to the CS ioctl that specifies optional flags
to the CS parser. Why this is useful is explained below. Note that some regs
no longer need the NOP relocation packet if this feature is enabled.
Tested on r300g and r600g with this flag disabled and enabled.
Assume there
This adds a new optional chunk to the CS ioctl that specifies optional flags
to the CS parser. Why this is useful is explained below. Note that some regs
no longer need the NOP relocation packet if this feature is enabled.
Tested on r300g and r600g with this flag disabled and enabled.
Assume there
This adds a new optional chunk to the CS ioctl that specifies optional flags
to the CS parser. Why this is useful is explained below. Note that some regs
no longer need the NOP relocation packet if this feature is enabled.
Tested on r300g and r600g with this flag disabled and enabled.
Assume there
This adds a new optional chunk to the CS ioctl that specifies optional flags
to the CS parser. Why this is useful is explained below. Note that some regs
no longer need the NOP relocation packet if this feature is enabled.
Tested on r300g and r600g with this flag disabled and enabled.
Assume there
Ping. Will anyone pick up this patch, please?
Marek
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> This adds a new optional chunk to the CS ioctl that specifies optional flags
> to the CS parser. Why this is useful is explained below. Note that some regs
> no longer need the NOP relocatio
Ping. Will anyone pick up this patch, please?
Marek
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> This adds a new optional chunk to the CS ioctl that specifies optional flags
> to the CS parser. Why this is useful is explained below. Note that some regs
> no longer need the NOP relocatio
Ping. Will anyone pick up this patch, please?
Marek
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> This adds a new optional chunk to the CS ioctl that specifies optional flags
> to the CS parser. Why this is useful is explained below. Note that some regs
> no longer need the NOP relocatio
Ping. Will anyone pick up this patch, please?
Marek
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> This adds a new optional chunk to the CS ioctl that specifies optional flags
> to the CS parser. Why this is useful is explained below. Note that some regs
> no longer need the NOP relocatio
Ping. Will anyone pick up this patch, please?
Marek
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> This adds a new optional chunk to the CS ioctl that specifies optional flags
> to the CS parser. Why this is useful is explained below. Note that some regs
> no longer need the NOP relocatio
Ping. Will anyone pick up this patch, please?
Marek
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> This adds a new optional chunk to the CS ioctl that specifies optional flags
> to the CS parser. Why this is useful is explained below. Note that some regs
> no longer need the NOP relocatio
12 matches
Mail list logo