On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 5:34 PM Ville Syrjälä
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 04:32:48PM +0100, Mario Kleiner wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 1:13 PM Ville Syrjälä <
> ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 09:47:48PM +0100, Mario Kleiner wrote:
> > > >
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 04:32:48PM +0100, Mario Kleiner wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 1:13 PM Ville Syrjälä
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 09:47:48PM +0100, Mario Kleiner wrote:
> > > The check was introduced to make sure that only the
> > > DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR modifier is accepted
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 1:13 PM Ville Syrjälä
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 09:47:48PM +0100, Mario Kleiner wrote:
> > The check was introduced to make sure that only the
> > DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR modifier is accepted by tinydrm.
> >
> > However, if .format_mod_supported is not hooked up to
>
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 09:47:48PM +0100, Mario Kleiner wrote:
> The check was introduced to make sure that only the
> DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR modifier is accepted by tinydrm.
>
> However, if .format_mod_supported is not hooked up to
> drm_simple_kms_format_mod_supported then the core will
> simply
The check was introduced to make sure that only the
DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR modifier is accepted by tinydrm.
However, if .format_mod_supported is not hooked up to
drm_simple_kms_format_mod_supported then the core will
simply validate modifiers against the format_modifiers
list passed into
