On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 02:17:03AM -0500, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> We attempt to get fences earlier in the hopes that everything will
> already have fences and no callbacks will be needed. If we do succeed
> in getting a fence, getting one a second time will result in a duplicate
> ref with no unre
Quoting Jason Ekstrand (2018-09-26 10:43:59)
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 3:18 AM Chris Wilson wrote:
>
> Quoting Jason Ekstrand (2018-09-26 08:17:03)
> > We attempt to get fences earlier in the hopes that everything will
> > already have fences and no callbacks will be needed. If we do
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 3:18 AM Chris Wilson
wrote:
> Quoting Jason Ekstrand (2018-09-26 08:17:03)
> > We attempt to get fences earlier in the hopes that everything will
> > already have fences and no callbacks will be needed. If we do succeed
> > in getting a fence, getting one a second time wi
Quoting Jason Ekstrand (2018-09-26 08:17:03)
> We attempt to get fences earlier in the hopes that everything will
> already have fences and no callbacks will be needed. If we do succeed
> in getting a fence, getting one a second time will result in a duplicate
> ref with no unref. This is causing
We attempt to get fences earlier in the hopes that everything will
already have fences and no callbacks will be needed. If we do succeed
in getting a fence, getting one a second time will result in a duplicate
ref with no unref. This is causing memory leaks in Vulkan applications
that create a lo
