On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 03:59:04PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 12:13:23AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > We do not really need to use API that fetches GPIO data from an
> > arbitrary device tree node, as we are dealing with device tree node
> > assigned to the device s
On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 12:13:23AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> We do not really need to use API that fetches GPIO data from an
> arbitrary device tree node, as we are dealing with device tree node
> assigned to the device structure. We can easily switch to
> devm_gpiod_get_optional() plus gpiod
We do not really need to use API that fetches GPIO data from an
arbitrary device tree node, as we are dealing with device tree node
assigned to the device structure. We can easily switch to
devm_gpiod_get_optional() plus gpiod_set_consumer_name() and clean up
the code.
Note this is part of efforts