Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: drop extra ttm_bo_put in ttm_bo_cleanup_refs

2023-03-17 Thread Christian König
Am 17.03.23 um 06:44 schrieb Dave Airlie: On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 19:27, Matthew Auld wrote: On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 07:26, Christian König wrote: That was accidentially left over when we switched to the delayed delete worker. Suggested-by: Matthew Auld Signed-off-by: Christian König Fixes:

Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: drop extra ttm_bo_put in ttm_bo_cleanup_refs

2023-03-16 Thread Dave Airlie
On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 19:27, Matthew Auld wrote: > > On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 07:26, Christian König > wrote: > > > > That was accidentially left over when we switched to the delayed delete > > worker. > > > > Suggested-by: Matthew Auld > > Signed-off-by: Christian König > > Fixes:

Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: drop extra ttm_bo_put in ttm_bo_cleanup_refs

2023-03-16 Thread Matthew Auld
On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 07:26, Christian König wrote: > > That was accidentially left over when we switched to the delayed delete > worker. > > Suggested-by: Matthew Auld > Signed-off-by: Christian König > Fixes: ("9bff18d13473") drm/ttm: use per BO cleanup workers > Reported-by: Steven Rostedt

[PATCH] drm/ttm: drop extra ttm_bo_put in ttm_bo_cleanup_refs

2023-03-16 Thread Christian König
That was accidentially left over when we switched to the delayed delete worker. Suggested-by: Matthew Auld Signed-off-by: Christian König Fixes: ("9bff18d13473") drm/ttm: use per BO cleanup workers Reported-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) Tested-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) ---