Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: remove special handling for non GEM drivers

2021-07-21 Thread Jamie Heilman
Christian König wrote: > This is a known issue and fixed by: > > commit a3a9ee4b5254f212c2adaa8cd8ca03bfa112f49d > Author: Christian König > Date:   Wed Jun 9 19:25:56 2021 +0200 > >     drm/nouveau: init the base GEM fields for internal BOs > >     TTMs buffer objects are based on GEM objects f

Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: remove special handling for non GEM drivers

2021-07-21 Thread Jamie Heilman
Christian König wrote: > vmwgfx is the only driver actually using this. Move the handling into > the driver instead. Maybe it isn't the only driver? This commit broke video on my system with a G86 [Quadro NVS 290]. Bisected to d02117f8efaa5fbc37437df1ae955a147a2a424a, and reverting it restored f

Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: remove special handling for non GEM drivers

2021-07-21 Thread Christian König
This is a known issue and fixed by: commit a3a9ee4b5254f212c2adaa8cd8ca03bfa112f49d Author: Christian König Date:   Wed Jun 9 19:25:56 2021 +0200     drm/nouveau: init the base GEM fields for internal BOs     TTMs buffer objects are based on GEM objects for quite a while     and rely on initia

Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: remove special handling for non GEM drivers

2021-04-22 Thread Zack Rusin
On 4/22/21 7:59 AM, Christian König wrote: Zack or Roland any objections to this? There shouldn't be any functional change. Sorry, that looks good. I wanted us to add gem support for a while now, this just adds more reasons to do it for next merge window. Reviewed-by: Zack Rusin __

Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: remove special handling for non GEM drivers

2021-04-22 Thread Christian König
Zack or Roland any objections to this? There shouldn't be any functional change. Thanks, Christian. Am 19.04.21 um 11:28 schrieb Christian König: vmwgfx is the only driver actually using this. Move the handling into the driver instead. Signed-off-by: Christian König --- drivers/gpu/drm/ttm

Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: remove special handling for non GEM drivers

2021-04-19 Thread Nirmoy
Tested-by: Nirmoy Das On 4/19/21 11:28 AM, Christian König wrote: vmwgfx is the only driver actually using this. Move the handling into the driver instead. Signed-off-by: Christian König --- drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 11 --- drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c | 10 ++

Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: remove special handling for non GEM drivers

2021-04-19 Thread Huang Rui
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 05:28:53PM +0800, Christian König wrote: > vmwgfx is the only driver actually using this. Move the handling into > the driver instead. > > Signed-off-by: Christian König Acked-by: Huang Rui > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 11 --- > drivers/gpu/drm/

[PATCH] drm/ttm: remove special handling for non GEM drivers

2021-04-19 Thread Christian König
vmwgfx is the only driver actually using this. Move the handling into the driver instead. Signed-off-by: Christian König --- drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 11 --- drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c | 10 ++ include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 19 --- 3 fil