On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 08:08:14AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 3:18 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 03:05:29PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 3:08 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 08:16:09AM -0700, Kees Cook w
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 3:18 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 03:05:29PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 3:08 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 08:16:09AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> >> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct t
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 03:05:29PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 3:08 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 08:16:09AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
> >> all timer callbacks, switch to usi
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 3:08 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 08:16:09AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
>> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
>> to pass the timer poin
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 08:16:09AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
> to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
>
> Cc: Patrik Jakobsson
> Cc: David Airli
In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
Cc: Patrik Jakobsson
Cc: David Airlie
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook
---
d
