On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 03:20:54PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 03:21:28PM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
> > This patch aims to replace the roll-your-own seqlock implementation with
> > full-blown seqlock'. We also remove the timestamp ring-buffer in favour
> > of single tim
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 03:21:28PM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
> This patch aims to replace the roll-your-own seqlock implementation with
> full-blown seqlock'. We also remove the timestamp ring-buffer in favour
> of single timestamp/count pair protected by a seqlock. In turn this
> means we can now
This patch aims to replace the roll-your-own seqlock implementation with
full-blown seqlock'. We also remove the timestamp ring-buffer in favour
of single timestamp/count pair protected by a seqlock. In turn this
means we can now increment the vblank freely without the need for
clamping.
v2:
- r
This patch aims to replace the roll-your-own seqlock implementation with
full-blown seqlock'. We also remove the timestamp ring-buffer in favour
of single timestamp/count pair protected by a seqlock. In turn this
means we can now increment the vblank freely without the need for
clamping.
v2:
- r
