On 17 May 2016 at 01:26, Francois Tigeot wrote:
>
> FreeBSD and NetBSD even have two different drm.h kernel headers. For some
> reason they think it is a good idea to keep a separate drm implementation
> from ~= 10 years ago or so.
No, we (FreeBSD) don't think it's a good idea. It's an unfortunat
Hi Randy,
randyf at sibernet.com wrote:
>
>If you are interested in the primary Solaris source, you will really
> want to looking at:
>
> https://java.net/projects/solaris-x11/sources/x-s12-clone/show/open-src/kernel
Thanks. This doesn't look like a git repository though.
How can I clone it ?
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 11:02:33PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 16 May 2016 at 17:24, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> >
> > The #else code path is not being used on DragonFly and actually breaks
> > kernel compilation.
> >
> I guess what I'm wondering here is where they working at some point in
> the
On Tue, 17 May 2016, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> Hi Randy,
>
> randyf at sibernet.com wrote:
>>
>>If you are interested in the primary Solaris source, you will really
>> want to looking at:
>>
>> https://java.net/projects/solaris-x11/sources/x-s12-clone/show/open-src/kernel
>
> Thanks. This do
On Tue, 17 May 2016, Francois Tigeot wrote:
>
>>> On the other hand, the non-Linux code path really is unused. I didn't want
>>> to be too intrusive in my patch but it's probably best to just remove it.
>>>
>> There is more to this world than Linux and BSD, there's Solaris as
>> well. Even though
On 16 May 2016 at 17:24, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> Hi Emil,
>
> Emil Velikov wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 14 May 2016 at 08:13, François Tigeot wrote:
>>>
>>> The drm code in DragonFly uses a local Linux implementation which doesn't
>>> define the __linux__ macro.
>>>
>>> Use __DragonFly__ instead in order
Hi Emil,
Emil Velikov wrote:
>
> On 14 May 2016 at 08:13, François Tigeot wrote:
>> The drm code in DragonFly uses a local Linux implementation which doesn't
>> define the __linux__ macro.
>>
>> Use __DragonFly__ instead in order to not try to compile non-Linux code.
> Does that meant that the w
Hi François,
On 14 May 2016 at 08:13, François Tigeot wrote:
> The drm code in DragonFly uses a local Linux implementation which doesn't
> define the __linux__ macro.
>
> Use __DragonFly__ instead in order to not try to compile non-Linux code.
Does that meant that the workarounds in the else st
The drm code in DragonFly uses a local Linux implementation which doesn't
define the __linux__ macro.
Use __DragonFly__ instead in order to not try to compile non-Linux code.
---
include/uapi/drm/drm.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/drm.h b/in
