On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:46:54AM +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> Rob,
> Can you take a look at this one too, now that I have your attention :-).
Oh, and now I read that you wanted Rob to look at this. Rob, I hope you
don't mind me jumping the queue.
Thierry
-- next part --
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 12:08:01PM +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> drmOpenByName() is a static function that is only called by drmOpen().
> drmOpen() already checks drmAvailable(), so the checki in
> drmOpenByName() is redundant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Kurtz
> ---
> xf86drm.c | 13 -
Rob,
Can you take a look at this one too, now that I have your attention :-).
-djk
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> drmOpenByName() is a static function that is only called by drmOpen().
> drmOpen() already checks drmAvailable(), so the checki in
> drmOpenByName() is redund
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Thierry Reding
wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:46:54AM +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
>> Rob,
>> Can you take a look at this one too, now that I have your attention :-).
>
> Oh, and now I read that you wanted Rob to look at this. Rob, I hope you
> don't mind me jum
drmOpenByName() is a static function that is only called by drmOpen().
drmOpen() already checks drmAvailable(), so the checki in
drmOpenByName() is redundant.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kurtz
---
xf86drm.c | 13 -
1 file changed, 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xf86drm.c b/xf86drm.c
index 7