Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Improve phandle-array schemas

2022-01-20 Thread Vladimir Oltean
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 07:50:38PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > The 'phandle-array' type is a bit ambiguous. It can be either just an > array of phandles or an array of phandles plus args. Many schemas for > phandle-array properties aren't clear in the schema which case applies > though the descript

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Improve phandle-array schemas

2022-01-19 Thread Vinod Koul
On 18-01-22, 19:50, Rob Herring wrote: > The 'phandle-array' type is a bit ambiguous. It can be either just an > array of phandles or an array of phandles plus args. Many schemas for > phandle-array properties aren't clear in the schema which case applies > though the description usually describes

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Improve phandle-array schemas

2022-01-19 Thread Stephen Boyd
Quoting Rob Herring (2022-01-18 17:50:38) > The 'phandle-array' type is a bit ambiguous. It can be either just an > array of phandles or an array of phandles plus args. Many schemas for > phandle-array properties aren't clear in the schema which case applies > though the description usually describ

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Improve phandle-array schemas

2022-01-19 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 07:50:38PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > The 'phandle-array' type is a bit ambiguous. It can be either just an > array of phandles or an array of phandles plus args. Many schemas for > phandle-array properties aren't clear in the schema which case applies > though the descript

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Improve phandle-array schemas

2022-01-19 Thread Rob Herring
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 9:22 AM Arnaud POULIQUEN wrote: > > Hello Rob, > > On 1/19/22 2:50 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > > The 'phandle-array' type is a bit ambiguous. It can be either just an > > array of phandles or an array of phandles plus args. Many schemas for > > phandle-array properties aren't

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Improve phandle-array schemas

2022-01-19 Thread Rob Herring
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 4:35 AM Vladimir Oltean wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 07:50:38PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > The 'phandle-array' type is a bit ambiguous. It can be either just an > > array of phandles or an array of phandles plus args. Many schemas for > > phandle-array properties a

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Improve phandle-array schemas

2022-01-19 Thread Arnaud POULIQUEN
Hello Rob, On 1/19/22 2:50 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > The 'phandle-array' type is a bit ambiguous. It can be either just an > array of phandles or an array of phandles plus args. Many schemas for > phandle-array properties aren't clear in the schema which case applies > though the description usuall

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Improve phandle-array schemas

2022-01-19 Thread Georgi Djakov
On 19.01.22 3:50, Rob Herring wrote: The 'phandle-array' type is a bit ambiguous. It can be either just an array of phandles or an array of phandles plus args. Many schemas for phandle-array properties aren't clear in the schema which case applies though the description usually describes it. T

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Improve phandle-array schemas

2022-01-19 Thread Ulf Hansson
On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 at 02:50, Rob Herring wrote: > > The 'phandle-array' type is a bit ambiguous. It can be either just an > array of phandles or an array of phandles plus args. Many schemas for > phandle-array properties aren't clear in the schema which case applies > though the description usual

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Improve phandle-array schemas

2022-01-19 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Rob, On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 2:50 AM Rob Herring wrote: > The 'phandle-array' type is a bit ambiguous. It can be either just an > array of phandles or an array of phandles plus args. Many schemas for > phandle-array properties aren't clear in the schema which case applies > though the descrip

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Improve phandle-array schemas

2022-01-19 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 07:50:38PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > The 'phandle-array' type is a bit ambiguous. It can be either just an > array of phandles or an array of phandles plus args. Many schemas for > phandle-array properties aren't clear in the schema which case applies > though the descript

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Improve phandle-array schemas

2022-01-18 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 18-01-22, 19:50, Rob Herring wrote: > The 'phandle-array' type is a bit ambiguous. It can be either just an > array of phandles or an array of phandles plus args. Many schemas for > phandle-array properties aren't clear in the schema which case applies > though the description usually describes

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Improve phandle-array schemas

2022-01-18 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On 19/01/2022 02:50, Rob Herring wrote: > The 'phandle-array' type is a bit ambiguous. It can be either just an > array of phandles or an array of phandles plus args. Many schemas for > phandle-array properties aren't clear in the schema which case applies > though the description usually describes

[PATCH] dt-bindings: Improve phandle-array schemas

2022-01-18 Thread Rob Herring
The 'phandle-array' type is a bit ambiguous. It can be either just an array of phandles or an array of phandles plus args. Many schemas for phandle-array properties aren't clear in the schema which case applies though the description usually describes it. The array of phandles case boils down to n