Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: msm/dsi: Don't require vdds-supply on 7nm PHY

2023-01-17 Thread Dmitry Baryshkov
On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 12:51:32 +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > On some SoCs (hello SM6375) vdds-supply is not wired to any smd-rpm > or rpmh regulator, but instead powered by the VDD_MX/mx.lvl line, > which is voted for in the DSI ctrl node. > > Applied, thanks! [1/1] dt-bindings: msm/dsi: Don't

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: msm/dsi: Don't require vdds-supply on 7nm PHY

2023-01-16 Thread Konrad Dybcio
On 16.01.2023 13:52, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 at 13:51, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> >> On some SoCs (hello SM6375) vdds-supply is not wired to any smd-rpm >> or rpmh regulator, but instead powered by the VDD_MX/mx.lvl line, >> which is voted for in the DSI ctrl node. > > I thi

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: msm/dsi: Don't require vdds-supply on 7nm PHY

2023-01-16 Thread Dmitry Baryshkov
On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 at 13:51, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > > On some SoCs (hello SM6375) vdds-supply is not wired to any smd-rpm > or rpmh regulator, but instead powered by the VDD_MX/mx.lvl line, > which is voted for in the DSI ctrl node. I think we should have an explicit `if compatible then required

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: msm/dsi: Don't require vdds-supply on 7nm PHY

2023-01-16 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On 16/01/2023 12:51, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > On some SoCs (hello SM6375) vdds-supply is not wired to any smd-rpm > or rpmh regulator, but instead powered by the VDD_MX/mx.lvl line, > which is voted for in the DSI ctrl node. > > Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio > --- Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski B

[PATCH] dt-bindings: msm/dsi: Don't require vdds-supply on 7nm PHY

2023-01-16 Thread Konrad Dybcio
On some SoCs (hello SM6375) vdds-supply is not wired to any smd-rpm or rpmh regulator, but instead powered by the VDD_MX/mx.lvl line, which is voted for in the DSI ctrl node. Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml | 1 - 1 file changed, 1