On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 12:51:32 +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On some SoCs (hello SM6375) vdds-supply is not wired to any smd-rpm
> or rpmh regulator, but instead powered by the VDD_MX/mx.lvl line,
> which is voted for in the DSI ctrl node.
>
>
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] dt-bindings: msm/dsi: Don't
On 16.01.2023 13:52, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 at 13:51, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>
>> On some SoCs (hello SM6375) vdds-supply is not wired to any smd-rpm
>> or rpmh regulator, but instead powered by the VDD_MX/mx.lvl line,
>> which is voted for in the DSI ctrl node.
>
> I thi
On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 at 13:51, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>
> On some SoCs (hello SM6375) vdds-supply is not wired to any smd-rpm
> or rpmh regulator, but instead powered by the VDD_MX/mx.lvl line,
> which is voted for in the DSI ctrl node.
I think we should have an explicit `if compatible then required
On 16/01/2023 12:51, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On some SoCs (hello SM6375) vdds-supply is not wired to any smd-rpm
> or rpmh regulator, but instead powered by the VDD_MX/mx.lvl line,
> which is voted for in the DSI ctrl node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio
> ---
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
B
On some SoCs (hello SM6375) vdds-supply is not wired to any smd-rpm
or rpmh regulator, but instead powered by the VDD_MX/mx.lvl line,
which is voted for in the DSI ctrl node.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml | 1 -
1 file changed, 1