On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Alan Cox wrote:
> These small changes should allow GEM to be used with non shmem objects as
> well as shmem objects. In the GMA500 case it allows the base framebuffer to
> appear as a GEM object and thus acquire a handle and work with KMS.
>
> For i915 it ought to b
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Alan Cox wrote:
> These small changes should allow GEM to be used with non shmem objects as
> well as shmem objects. In the GMA500 case it allows the base framebuffer to
> appear as a GEM object and thus acquire a handle and work with KMS.
>
> For i915 it ought to b
These small changes should allow GEM to be used with non shmem objects as
well as shmem objects. In the GMA500 case it allows the base framebuffer to
appear as a GEM object and thus acquire a handle and work with KMS.
For i915 it ought to be trivial to get back the wasted memory but putting the
sy
These small changes should allow GEM to be used with non shmem objects as
well as shmem objects. In the GMA500 case it allows the base framebuffer to
appear as a GEM object and thus acquire a handle and work with KMS.
For i915 it ought to be trivial to get back the wasted memory but putting the
sy
