Re: [PATCH] gpu: drm: bridge: No need to set device_driver owner

2023-05-16 Thread Neil Armstrong
Hi, On Sat, 13 May 2023 15:42:17 +0530, Anup Sharma wrote: > There is no need to exclusively set the .owner member of the struct > device_driver when defining the platform_driver struct. The Linux core > takes care of setting the .owner member as part of the call to > module_platform_driver() help

Re: [PATCH] gpu: drm: bridge: No need to set device_driver owner

2023-05-16 Thread Neil Armstrong
On 13/05/2023 12:12, Anup Sharma wrote: There is no need to exclusively set the .owner member of the struct device_driver when defining the platform_driver struct. The Linux core takes care of setting the .owner member as part of the call to module_platform_driver() helper function. Issue identi

[PATCH] gpu: drm: bridge: No need to set device_driver owner

2023-05-15 Thread Anup Sharma
There is no need to exclusively set the .owner member of the struct device_driver when defining the platform_driver struct. The Linux core takes care of setting the .owner member as part of the call to module_platform_driver() helper function. Issue identified using the platform_no_drv_owner.cocci