On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Ilija Hadzic
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> Below is a patch against the master branch of libdrm that adds support for
>> waits for vblank events on CRTCs that are greater than 1 (and thus cannot be
>> represented using
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Ilija Hadzic
wrote:
Hi Alex,
Below is a patch against the master branch of libdrm that adds support for
waits for vblank events on CRTCs that are greater than 1 (and thus cannot be
represented using current primary/s
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Ilija Hadzic
wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> Below is a patch against the master branch of libdrm that adds support for
> waits for vblank events on CRTCs that are greater than 1 (and thus cannot be
> represented using current primary/secondary flags interface). The patch
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Ilija Hadzic
wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> Below is a patch against the master branch of libdrm that adds support for
> waits for vblank events on CRTCs that are greater than 1 (and thus cannot be
> represented using current primary/secondary flags interface). The patch
Hi Alex,
Below is a patch against the master branch of libdrm that adds support
for waits for vblank events on CRTCs that are greater than 1 (and thus
cannot be represented using current primary/secondary flags interface).
The patch adds a new DRM_CAP so that the application can check whether
Hi Alex,
Below is a patch against the master branch of libdrm that adds support
for waits for vblank events on CRTCs that are greater than 1 (and thus
cannot be represented using current primary/secondary flags interface).
The patch adds a new DRM_CAP so that the application can check whether