Re: [PATCH 0/3] Android support

2012-10-14 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 15:27:27 -0700 Eric Anholt wrote: > Negreanu Marius writes: > > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Tapani Pälli > > wrote: > >> On 10/10/2012 08:05 PM, Chad Versace wrote: > >>> On 10/07/2012 10:50 PM, Tapani Pälli wrote: > Upstreaming old set of patches here to enab

[PATCH 0/3] Add ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM support

2012-10-29 Thread Rob Clark
From: Rob Clark I was updating omapdrm to support ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM, and noticed that imx and exynos only required a Kconfig change, so I went ahead and updated them too. The shmobile driver didn't seem so straightforward due to backlight device stuff, so I skipped it. Having ARCH_MULTIPLATFOR

[PATCH 0/3] radeon cursor patches

2011-09-30 Thread Michel Dänzer
While reviewing Nicholas Miell's patch 'drm/radeon/kms: fix cursor image off-by-one error', I noticed at least one other bug (fixed by patch 2, and one potential bug fixed by patch 3) and opportunities for cleanup. Patch 1 is based on Nicholas' patch and can be dropped if he amends his patch along

[PATCH 0/3] fbdev no more!

2013-06-16 Thread Daniel Vetter
Hi all, So I've taken a look again at the locking mess in our fbdev support and cried. Fixing up the console_lock mess around the fbdev notifier will be real work, semanatically the fbdev layer does lots of stupid things (like the radeon resume issue I've just debugged) and the panic notifier is p

[PATCH 0/3] drm: minor cleanups

2013-07-01 Thread Seung-Woo Kim
This patch series fixes minor code issues including wrong trace point foramts, meaningless null checking, and possible resource leak in error cases. This is based drm-next branch. Seung-Woo Kim (2): drm: fix print format of sequence in trace point drm: move edid null check to the first part

[PATCH 0/3] further BKL removal

2010-07-11 Thread Arnd Bergmann
With the ioctl, block, tty, vfs and llseek series on their way into linux-next, these three patches are attacking the hardest remaining issues. If we get these ready for 2.6.36, the kernel should be almost usable with the BKL disabled. In all three cases, I'm cheating a bit, because the BKL still

[PATCH 0/3] ttm / vmwgfx fixes

2010-11-02 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
Patch 1 fixes a case where a sync object may already have been destroyed when the sync_obj_flush function is called. Patch 2 and 3 deal with non-root EGL masters. On current vmwgfx, trying to run EGL as a non-root user results in a kernel oops. ___ dri-d

Re: [PATCH 0/3] drm_pcie_get_speed_cap_mask() cleanups

2013-01-04 Thread Alex Deucher
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > These are minor cleanups for drm_pcie_get_speed_cap_mask() to use > standard #defines and PCIe capability accessors. They depend on > a pci_regs.h change (130f1b8f35) that appeared in v3.8-rc2. > > They don't address the issue of DRM devices

[PATCH 0/3] [RFC] DRM Render Nodes

2012-09-28 Thread Kristian Høgsberg
Here's the patch to implement render nodes as discussed in the "DRM2" talk at XDC: http://wiki.x.org/wiki/Events/XDC2012/Proceedings#DRM2 The core problem is that DRM security is compromised in the face of VT switching and multiple DRM masters. Any local user can access all shared buffers from

[PATCH 0/3] updated exynos-drm-fixes

2012-04-23 Thread Inki Dae
this patch set fixes gem allocation and mapping issue between user space and physical memory region. this patch set is based on git repository below: git://people.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux.git drm-fixes commit-id: 273a50fbcd2d2c0652bbda58dd1985f932ce6d75 Inki Dae (3): drm/e

Re: [PATCH 0/3] radeon cursor patches

2011-09-30 Thread Nicholas Miell
On 09/30/2011 08:16 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote: > While reviewing Nicholas Miell's patch 'drm/radeon/kms: fix cursor image > off-by-one error', I noticed at least one other bug (fixed by patch 2, and one > potential bug fixed by patch 3) and opportunities for cleanup. > > Patch 1 is based on Nicholas

Re: [PATCH 0/3] radeon cursor patches

2011-10-03 Thread Alex Deucher
2011/9/30 Michel Dänzer : > While reviewing Nicholas Miell's patch 'drm/radeon/kms: fix cursor image > off-by-one error', I noticed at least one other bug (fixed by patch 2, and one > potential bug fixed by patch 3) and opportunities for cleanup. > > Patch 1 is based on Nicholas' patch and can be d

[RESEND PATCH 0/3] Miscellaneous KMS fixes

2013-04-15 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hello, Upon Daniel Vetter's request here's a repost of two mode set and page flip fixes that were initially sent nearly a year ago under the title "[PATCH 0/2] Miscellaneous mode set and page flip fixes". I've also added a third, already acked, pending patch to the set. Laurent Pinchart

[PATCH 0/3] Additional radeon audio cleanups

2013-04-18 Thread alexdeucher
From: Alex Deucher This set of patches does some additional audio cleanups and switches to per asic callbacks for audio. Alex Deucher (3): drm/radeon: clean up audio supported check drm/radeon: clean up audio dto programming drm/radeon: switch audio handling to use callbacks drivers/gpu/

[PATCH 0/3] drm: kernel-doc fixes

2013-05-08 Thread ville . syrjala
Just a few misc. kernel-doc fixes I spotted while looking into the subject matter. ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

[PATCH 0/3] radeon: add pageflip support

2010-10-26 Thread Alex Deucher
This set of patches adds pageflipping support for radeon. There are two drm patches and one ddx patch required. The drm patches are against Dave's drm-next branch and the ddx patch is against git master. So far it's been lightly tested with openarena on a variety of radeons. Feedback appreciated

[PATCH 0/3] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo

2010-11-13 Thread Daniel Vetter
Hi all, This patch series embeds drm_gem_object into struct radeon_bo and adjusts any references. I've decided against embedding the gem stuff into struct ttm_bo because - vmwgfx doesn't use gem and - ttm is used for implementing the memory management, whereas gem provides the userspace interfac

[PATCH 0/3] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo

2010-11-27 Thread Daniel Vetter
Hi Dave, As promised rebased on top of latest drm-next to resolve a conflict the pageflipping code. Tested on my agp rv570. Please review and consider merging for -next. Thanks, Daniel Daniel Vetter (3): drm/radeon: embed struct drm_gem_object drm/radeon: introduce gem_to_radeon_bo helper

[PATCH 0/3] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo

2010-11-27 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi Daniel, I have tested this upgraded patchset again with linux-next (next-20101126), they work fine. Can you next time label the complete series as "v2": [PATCH 0/3 v2] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo (don't ask me if git can create this automatically for you). F

Re: [PATCH 0/3] fbdev no more!

2013-06-16 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi all, > > So I've taken a look again at the locking mess in our fbdev support and cried. > Fixing up the console_lock mess around the fbdev notifier will be real work, > semanatically the fbdev layer does lots of stupid things (like the

Re: [PATCH 0/3] fbdev no more!

2013-06-17 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 04:57:17PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi all, > > So I've taken a look again at the locking mess in our fbdev support and cried. > Fixing up the console_lock mess around the fbdev notifier will be real work, > semanatically the fbdev layer does lots of stupid things (lik

Re: [PATCH 0/3] fbdev no more!

2013-06-17 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On 06/16/2013 07:57 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi all, > > So I've taken a look again at the locking mess in our fbdev support and cried. > Fixing up the console_lock mess around the fbdev notifier will be real work, > semanatically the fbdev layer does lots of stupid things (like the radeon > re

Re: [PATCH 0/3] fbdev no more!

2013-06-17 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On 06/16/2013 07:57 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> So I've taken a look again at the locking mess in our fbdev support and >> cried. >> Fixing up the console_lock mess around the fbdev notifier will be real work, >> semanat

Re: [PATCH 0/3] fbdev no more!

2013-06-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 04:57:17PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> So I've taken a look again at the locking mess in our fbdev support and >> cried. >> Fixing up the console_lock mess around the fbdev notifier will be re

[PATCH 0/3] drm/radeon kexec fixes

2013-09-08 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
Here are a couple of patches that get kexec working with radeon devices. I've tested this on my RS780. Comments or flames are welcome. Thanks. Markus Trippelsdorf (3): kexec: get rid of late printk drm/radeon: Implement radeon_pci_shutdown drm/radeon: get rid of r100_restore_sanity hack d

[PATCH 0/3] drm/edid: EST fixes

2013-10-14 Thread ville . syrjala
I was staring at the est modes a bit and noticed a few small bugs. Also the modes in our lists confused the hell out of me (esp. the 1152x870 vs 1152x864 issue) until I thought to go digging through xf86EdidModes.c where the history is actually documented. Looks like the >=0 vs >0 issue was also

[PATCH 0/3] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo

2010-11-13 Thread Daniel Vetter
Hi all, This patch series embeds drm_gem_object into struct radeon_bo and adjusts any references. I've decided against embedding the gem stuff into struct ttm_bo because - vmwgfx doesn't use gem and - ttm is used for implementing the memory management, whereas gem provides the userspace interfac

[PATCH 0/3] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo

2010-11-15 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
Hi, Daniel, My main concerns previously for embedding GEM objects as user-space references for TTM has been twofold and implementation specific. 1) The locking has been using global mutexes where local spin- or RCU locks have been more appropriate. It looks like this has finally been / is fina

[PATCH 0/3] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo

2010-11-15 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi Daniel, I have tried this patchset on a RV250 with linux-next (next-20101115) in combination w/ patchset from "[PATCH 0/9] make struct drm_mm_node embeddable" [1]. glxgears works nice. 2nd test-case is Eric Anholt's OpenArena benchmark. The screen gets blank and system is unusable (cold start,

[PATCH 0/3] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo

2010-11-15 Thread Daniel Vetter
Hi Thomas, Thanks for your comments about ttm and vmwgfx. Some of my own ideas about where this might all be heading below. On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 08:25:16AM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > Hi, Daniel, > > My main concerns previously for embedding GEM objects as user-space > references for TTM

[PATCH 0/3] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo

2010-11-15 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
On 11/15/2010 07:45 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > Thanks for your comments about ttm and vmwgfx. Some of my own ideas about > where this might all be heading below. > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 08:25:16AM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > >> Hi, Daniel, >> >> My main concerns previous

[PATCH 0/3] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo

2010-11-16 Thread Sedat Dilek
[ CCing Arnd Bergmann ] Hi, I have tested both patchsets from Daniel (see [1] and [2]) again on a Radeon RV250 in a none-BKL-config and it looks like agd5f-pflip/0002-drm-radeon-kms-add-pageflip-ioctl-support.patch is the culprit in combination with the below listed drm patches. I have

[PATCH 0/3] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo

2010-11-16 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:05:25PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > I have tested both patchsets from Daniel (see [1] and [2]) again on a > Radeon RV250 in a none-BKL-config and it looks like > >agd5f-pflip/0002-drm-radeon-kms-add-pageflip-ioctl-support.patch > > is the culprit in combination

[PATCH 0/3] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo

2010-11-16 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:05:25PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> I have tested both patchsets from Daniel (see [1] and [2]) again on a >> Radeon RV250 in a none-BKL-config and it looks like >> >> ? ? ? ?agd5f-pflip/0002-drm-radeon-kms-add-page

[PATCH 0/3] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo

2010-11-16 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:05:25PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> I have tested both patchsets from Daniel (see [1] and [2]) again on a >>> Radeon RV250 in a none-BKL-config and it looks

[PATCH 0/3] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo

2010-11-27 Thread Daniel Vetter
Hi Dave, As promised rebased on top of latest drm-next to resolve a conflict the pageflipping code. Tested on my agp rv570. Please review and consider merging for -next. Thanks, Daniel Daniel Vetter (3): drm/radeon: embed struct drm_gem_object drm/radeon: introduce gem_to_radeon_bo helper

[PATCH 0/3] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo

2010-11-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi Daniel, I have tested this upgraded patchset again with linux-next (next-20101126), they work fine. Can you next time label the complete series as "v2": [PATCH 0/3 v2] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo (don't ask me if git can create this automatically for you). F

[PATCH 0/3] radeon: add pageflip support

2010-10-26 Thread Alex Deucher
This set of patches adds pageflipping support for radeon. There are two drm patches and one ddx patch required. The drm patches are against Dave's drm-next branch and the ddx patch is against git master. So far it's been lightly tested with openarena on a variety of radeons. Feedback appreciated

[PATCH 0/3] radeon: add pageflip support

2010-10-26 Thread Alex Deucher
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 4:30 AM, Alex Deucher wrote: > This set of patches adds pageflipping support for radeon. > There are two drm patches and one ddx patch required. ?The > drm patches are against Dave's drm-next branch and the ddx > patch is against git master. ?So far it's been lightly tested

[PATCH 0/3] radeon: add pageflip support

2010-10-26 Thread Alex Deucher
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 4:55 AM, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 4:30 AM, Alex Deucher > wrote: >> This set of patches adds pageflipping support for radeon. >> There are two drm patches and one ddx patch required. ?The >> drm patches are against Dave's drm-next branch and the ddx >

[PATCH 0/3] GET_PLANE2 w/ i915 implementation

2017-01-11 Thread Ben Widawsky
This patch series implements GET_PLANE2 support for Intel platforms and defines the new kernel UAPI. The idea was originally introduced by Kristian. Ultimately, the purpose of the new API is to provide the ability to query per-plane modifiers in KMS. These modifiers, which are just fb modifiers, wi

[PATCH 0/3] Use nonblocking atomic helpers

2017-01-12 Thread Fabien Dessenne
This series replaces the driver customized atomic_commit implementation with the drm core helpers (patch 1). The vblank event management is reworked (patch 2) and a side-effect is fixed (patch 3). Fabien ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freed

Re: [PATCH 0/3] radeon cursor patches

2011-09-30 Thread Nicholas Miell
On 09/30/2011 08:16 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote: > While reviewing Nicholas Miell's patch 'drm/radeon/kms: fix cursor image > off-by-one error', I noticed at least one other bug (fixed by patch 2, and one > potential bug fixed by patch 3) and opportunities for cleanup. > > Patch 1 is based on Nicholas

Re: [PATCH 0/3] radeon cursor patches

2011-10-03 Thread Alex Deucher
2011/9/30 Michel Dänzer : > While reviewing Nicholas Miell's patch 'drm/radeon/kms: fix cursor image > off-by-one error', I noticed at least one other bug (fixed by patch 2, and one > potential bug fixed by patch 3) and opportunities for cleanup. > > Patch 1 is based on Nicholas' patch and can be d

[PATCH 0/3] radeon: add pageflip support

2010-10-26 Thread Alex Deucher
This set of patches adds pageflipping support for radeon. There are two drm patches and one ddx patch required. The drm patches are against Dave's drm-next branch and the ddx patch is against git master. So far it's been lightly tested with openarena on a variety of radeons. Feedback appreciated

[PATCH 0/3] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo

2010-11-13 Thread Daniel Vetter
Hi all, This patch series embeds drm_gem_object into struct radeon_bo and adjusts any references. I've decided against embedding the gem stuff into struct ttm_bo because - vmwgfx doesn't use gem and - ttm is used for implementing the memory management, whereas gem provides the userspace interfac

[PATCH 0/3] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo

2010-11-27 Thread Daniel Vetter
Hi Dave, As promised rebased on top of latest drm-next to resolve a conflict the pageflipping code. Tested on my agp rv570. Please review and consider merging for -next. Thanks, Daniel Daniel Vetter (3): drm/radeon: embed struct drm_gem_object drm/radeon: introduce gem_to_radeon_bo helper

[PATCH 0/3] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo

2010-11-27 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi Daniel, I have tested this upgraded patchset again with linux-next (next-20101126), they work fine. Can you next time label the complete series as "v2": [PATCH 0/3 v2] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo (don't ask me if git can create this automatically for you). F

[PATCH 0/3] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo

2010-11-13 Thread Daniel Vetter
Hi all, This patch series embeds drm_gem_object into struct radeon_bo and adjusts any references. I've decided against embedding the gem stuff into struct ttm_bo because - vmwgfx doesn't use gem and - ttm is used for implementing the memory management, whereas gem provides the userspace interfac

[PATCH 0/3] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo

2010-11-15 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
Hi, Daniel, My main concerns previously for embedding GEM objects as user-space references for TTM has been twofold and implementation specific. 1) The locking has been using global mutexes where local spin- or RCU locks have been more appropriate. It looks like this has finally been / is fina

[PATCH 0/3] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo

2010-11-15 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi Daniel, I have tried this patchset on a RV250 with linux-next (next-20101115) in combination w/ patchset from "[PATCH 0/9] make struct drm_mm_node embeddable" [1]. glxgears works nice. 2nd test-case is Eric Anholt's OpenArena benchmark. The screen gets blank and system is unusable (cold start,

[PATCH 0/3] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo

2010-11-15 Thread Daniel Vetter
Hi Thomas, Thanks for your comments about ttm and vmwgfx. Some of my own ideas about where this might all be heading below. On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 08:25:16AM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > Hi, Daniel, > > My main concerns previously for embedding GEM objects as user-space > references for TTM

[PATCH 0/3] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo

2010-11-15 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
On 11/15/2010 07:45 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > Thanks for your comments about ttm and vmwgfx. Some of my own ideas about > where this might all be heading below. > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 08:25:16AM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > >> Hi, Daniel, >> >> My main concerns previous

[PATCH 0/3] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo

2010-11-16 Thread Sedat Dilek
[ CCing Arnd Bergmann ] Hi, I have tested both patchsets from Daniel (see [1] and [2]) again on a Radeon RV250 in a none-BKL-config and it looks like agd5f-pflip/0002-drm-radeon-kms-add-pageflip-ioctl-support.patch is the culprit in combination with the below listed drm patches. I have

[PATCH 0/3] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo

2010-11-16 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:05:25PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > I have tested both patchsets from Daniel (see [1] and [2]) again on a > Radeon RV250 in a none-BKL-config and it looks like > >agd5f-pflip/0002-drm-radeon-kms-add-pageflip-ioctl-support.patch > > is the culprit in combination

[PATCH 0/3] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo

2010-11-16 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:05:25PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> I have tested both patchsets from Daniel (see [1] and [2]) again on a >> Radeon RV250 in a none-BKL-config and it looks like >> >> ? ? ? ?agd5f-pflip/0002-drm-radeon-kms-add-page

[PATCH 0/3] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo

2010-11-16 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:05:25PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> I have tested both patchsets from Daniel (see [1] and [2]) again on a >>> Radeon RV250 in a none-BKL-config and it looks

[PATCH 0/3] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo

2010-11-27 Thread Daniel Vetter
Hi Dave, As promised rebased on top of latest drm-next to resolve a conflict the pageflipping code. Tested on my agp rv570. Please review and consider merging for -next. Thanks, Daniel Daniel Vetter (3): drm/radeon: embed struct drm_gem_object drm/radeon: introduce gem_to_radeon_bo helper

[PATCH 0/3] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo

2010-11-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi Daniel, I have tested this upgraded patchset again with linux-next (next-20101126), they work fine. Can you next time label the complete series as "v2": [PATCH 0/3 v2] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo (don't ask me if git can create this automatically for you). F

[PATCH 0/3] radeon: add pageflip support

2010-10-26 Thread Alex Deucher
This set of patches adds pageflipping support for radeon. There are two drm patches and one ddx patch required. The drm patches are against Dave's drm-next branch and the ddx patch is against git master. So far it's been lightly tested with openarena on a variety of radeons. Feedback appreciated

[PATCH 0/3] radeon: add pageflip support

2010-10-26 Thread Alex Deucher
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 4:30 AM, Alex Deucher wrote: > This set of patches adds pageflipping support for radeon. > There are two drm patches and one ddx patch required. ?The > drm patches are against Dave's drm-next branch and the ddx > patch is against git master. ?So far it's been lightly tested

[PATCH 0/3] radeon: add pageflip support

2010-10-26 Thread Alex Deucher
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 4:55 AM, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 4:30 AM, Alex Deucher > wrote: >> This set of patches adds pageflipping support for radeon. >> There are two drm patches and one ddx patch required. ?The >> drm patches are against Dave's drm-next branch and the ddx >

[PATCH 0/3] drm/edid: EST fixes

2013-10-14 Thread ville . syrjala
I was staring at the est modes a bit and noticed a few small bugs. Also the modes in our lists confused the hell out of me (esp. the 1152x870 vs 1152x864 issue) until I thought to go digging through xf86EdidModes.c where the history is actually documented. Looks like the >=0 vs >0 issue was also

[PATCH 0/3] GET_PLANE2 w/ i915 implementation

2017-01-11 Thread Ben Widawsky
This patch series implements GET_PLANE2 support for Intel platforms and defines the new kernel UAPI. The idea was originally introduced by Kristian. Ultimately, the purpose of the new API is to provide the ability to query per-plane modifiers in KMS. These modifiers, which are just fb modifiers, wi

[PATCH 0/3] Use nonblocking atomic helpers

2017-01-12 Thread Fabien Dessenne
This series replaces the driver customized atomic_commit implementation with the drm core helpers (patch 1). The vblank event management is reworked (patch 2) and a side-effect is fixed (patch 3). Fabien ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freed

[PATCH 0/3] updated exynos-drm-fixes

2012-04-23 Thread Inki Dae
this patch set fixes gem allocation and mapping issue between user space and physical memory region. this patch set is based on git repository below: git://people.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux.git drm-fixes commit-id: 273a50fbcd2d2c0652bbda58dd1985f932ce6d75 Inki Dae (3): drm/e

[PATCH 0/3] [RFC] DRM Render Nodes

2012-09-28 Thread Kristian Høgsberg
Here's the patch to implement render nodes as discussed in the "DRM2" talk at XDC: http://wiki.x.org/wiki/Events/XDC2012/Proceedings#DRM2 The core problem is that DRM security is compromised in the face of VT switching and multiple DRM masters. Any local user can access all shared buffers from

[RESEND PATCH 0/3] Miscellaneous KMS fixes

2013-04-15 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hello, Upon Daniel Vetter's request here's a repost of two mode set and page flip fixes that were initially sent nearly a year ago under the title "[PATCH 0/2] Miscellaneous mode set and page flip fixes". I've also added a third, already acked, pending patch to the set. Laurent Pinchart

[PATCH 0/3] Additional radeon audio cleanups

2013-04-18 Thread alexdeucher
From: Alex Deucher This set of patches does some additional audio cleanups and switches to per asic callbacks for audio. Alex Deucher (3): drm/radeon: clean up audio supported check drm/radeon: clean up audio dto programming drm/radeon: switch audio handling to use callbacks drivers/gpu/

[PATCH 0/3] drm: kernel-doc fixes

2013-05-08 Thread ville . syrjala
Just a few misc. kernel-doc fixes I spotted while looking into the subject matter. ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

[PATCH 0/3] drm/radeon kexec fixes

2013-09-08 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
Here are a couple of patches that get kexec working with radeon devices. I've tested this on my RS780. Comments or flames are welcome. Thanks. Markus Trippelsdorf (3): kexec: get rid of late printk drm/radeon: Implement radeon_pci_shutdown drm/radeon: get rid of r100_restore_sanity hack d

Re: [PATCH 0/3] fbdev no more!

2013-06-16 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi all, > > So I've taken a look again at the locking mess in our fbdev support and cried. > Fixing up the console_lock mess around the fbdev notifier will be real work, > semanatically the fbdev layer does lots of stupid things (like the

Re: [PATCH 0/3] fbdev no more!

2013-06-17 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 04:57:17PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi all, > > So I've taken a look again at the locking mess in our fbdev support and cried. > Fixing up the console_lock mess around the fbdev notifier will be real work, > semanatically the fbdev layer does lots of stupid things (lik

Re: [PATCH 0/3] fbdev no more!

2013-06-17 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On 06/16/2013 07:57 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi all, > > So I've taken a look again at the locking mess in our fbdev support and cried. > Fixing up the console_lock mess around the fbdev notifier will be real work, > semanatically the fbdev layer does lots of stupid things (like the radeon > re

Re: [PATCH 0/3] fbdev no more!

2013-06-17 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On 06/16/2013 07:57 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> So I've taken a look again at the locking mess in our fbdev support and >> cried. >> Fixing up the console_lock mess around the fbdev notifier will be real work, >> semanat

Re: [PATCH 0/3] fbdev no more!

2013-06-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 04:57:17PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> So I've taken a look again at the locking mess in our fbdev support and >> cried. >> Fixing up the console_lock mess around the fbdev notifier will be re

[PATCH 0/3] [RFC] DRM Render Nodes

2012-09-28 Thread Kristian Høgsberg
Here's the patch to implement render nodes as discussed in the "DRM2" talk at XDC: http://wiki.x.org/wiki/Events/XDC2012/Proceedings#DRM2 The core problem is that DRM security is compromised in the face of VT switching and multiple DRM masters. Any local user can access all shared buffers from

[PATCH 0/3] updated exynos-drm-fixes

2012-04-23 Thread Inki Dae
this patch set fixes gem allocation and mapping issue between user space and physical memory region. this patch set is based on git repository below: git://people.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux.git drm-fixes commit-id: 273a50fbcd2d2c0652bbda58dd1985f932ce6d75 Inki Dae (3): drm/e

Re: [PATCH 0/3] radeon cursor patches

2011-09-30 Thread Nicholas Miell
On 09/30/2011 08:16 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote: > While reviewing Nicholas Miell's patch 'drm/radeon/kms: fix cursor image > off-by-one error', I noticed at least one other bug (fixed by patch 2, and one > potential bug fixed by patch 3) and opportunities for cleanup. > > Patch 1 is based on Nicholas

Re: [PATCH 0/3] radeon cursor patches

2011-10-03 Thread Alex Deucher
2011/9/30 Michel Dänzer : > While reviewing Nicholas Miell's patch 'drm/radeon/kms: fix cursor image > off-by-one error', I noticed at least one other bug (fixed by patch 2, and one > potential bug fixed by patch 3) and opportunities for cleanup. > > Patch 1 is based on Nicholas' patch and can be d

[PATCH 0/3] radeon: add pageflip support

2010-10-26 Thread Alex Deucher
This set of patches adds pageflipping support for radeon. There are two drm patches and one ddx patch required. The drm patches are against Dave's drm-next branch and the ddx patch is against git master. So far it's been lightly tested with openarena on a variety of radeons. Feedback appreciated

[PATCH 0/3] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo

2010-11-13 Thread Daniel Vetter
Hi all, This patch series embeds drm_gem_object into struct radeon_bo and adjusts any references. I've decided against embedding the gem stuff into struct ttm_bo because - vmwgfx doesn't use gem and - ttm is used for implementing the memory management, whereas gem provides the userspace interfac

[PATCH 0/3] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo

2010-11-27 Thread Daniel Vetter
Hi Dave, As promised rebased on top of latest drm-next to resolve a conflict the pageflipping code. Tested on my agp rv570. Please review and consider merging for -next. Thanks, Daniel Daniel Vetter (3): drm/radeon: embed struct drm_gem_object drm/radeon: introduce gem_to_radeon_bo helper

[PATCH 0/3] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo

2010-11-27 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi Daniel, I have tested this upgraded patchset again with linux-next (next-20101126), they work fine. Can you next time label the complete series as "v2": [PATCH 0/3 v2] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo (don't ask me if git can create this automatically for you). F

[PATCH 0/3] drm/radeon kexec fixes

2013-09-08 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
Here are a couple of patches that get kexec working with radeon devices. I've tested this on my RS780. Comments or flames are welcome. Thanks. Markus Trippelsdorf (3): kexec: get rid of late printk drm/radeon: Implement radeon_pci_shutdown drm/radeon: get rid of r100_restore_sanity hack d

[RESEND PATCH 0/3] Miscellaneous KMS fixes

2013-04-15 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hello, Upon Daniel Vetter's request here's a repost of two mode set and page flip fixes that were initially sent nearly a year ago under the title "[PATCH 0/2] Miscellaneous mode set and page flip fixes". I've also added a third, already acked, pending patch to the set. Laurent Pinchart

[PATCH 0/3] Additional radeon audio cleanups

2013-04-18 Thread alexdeucher
From: Alex Deucher This set of patches does some additional audio cleanups and switches to per asic callbacks for audio. Alex Deucher (3): drm/radeon: clean up audio supported check drm/radeon: clean up audio dto programming drm/radeon: switch audio handling to use callbacks drivers/gpu/

[PATCH 0/3] drm: kernel-doc fixes

2013-05-08 Thread ville . syrjala
Just a few misc. kernel-doc fixes I spotted while looking into the subject matter. ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [PATCH 0/3] fbdev no more!

2013-06-16 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi all, > > So I've taken a look again at the locking mess in our fbdev support and cried. > Fixing up the console_lock mess around the fbdev notifier will be real work, > semanatically the fbdev layer does lots of stupid things (like the

Re: [PATCH 0/3] fbdev no more!

2013-06-17 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 04:57:17PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi all, > > So I've taken a look again at the locking mess in our fbdev support and cried. > Fixing up the console_lock mess around the fbdev notifier will be real work, > semanatically the fbdev layer does lots of stupid things (lik

Re: [PATCH 0/3] fbdev no more!

2013-06-17 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On 06/16/2013 07:57 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi all, > > So I've taken a look again at the locking mess in our fbdev support and cried. > Fixing up the console_lock mess around the fbdev notifier will be real work, > semanatically the fbdev layer does lots of stupid things (like the radeon > re

Re: [PATCH 0/3] fbdev no more!

2013-06-17 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On 06/16/2013 07:57 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> So I've taken a look again at the locking mess in our fbdev support and >> cried. >> Fixing up the console_lock mess around the fbdev notifier will be real work, >> semanat

Re: [PATCH 0/3] fbdev no more!

2013-06-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 04:57:17PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> So I've taken a look again at the locking mess in our fbdev support and >> cried. >> Fixing up the console_lock mess around the fbdev notifier will be re

[PATCH 0/3] radeon: add pageflip support

2010-10-26 Thread Alex Deucher
This set of patches adds pageflipping support for radeon. There are two drm patches and one ddx patch required. The drm patches are against Dave's drm-next branch and the ddx patch is against git master. So far it's been lightly tested with openarena on a variety of radeons. Feedback appreciated

[PATCH 0/3] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo

2010-11-13 Thread Daniel Vetter
Hi all, This patch series embeds drm_gem_object into struct radeon_bo and adjusts any references. I've decided against embedding the gem stuff into struct ttm_bo because - vmwgfx doesn't use gem and - ttm is used for implementing the memory management, whereas gem provides the userspace interfac

[PATCH 0/3] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo

2010-11-27 Thread Daniel Vetter
Hi Dave, As promised rebased on top of latest drm-next to resolve a conflict the pageflipping code. Tested on my agp rv570. Please review and consider merging for -next. Thanks, Daniel Daniel Vetter (3): drm/radeon: embed struct drm_gem_object drm/radeon: introduce gem_to_radeon_bo helper

[PATCH 0/3] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo

2010-11-27 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi Daniel, I have tested this upgraded patchset again with linux-next (next-20101126), they work fine. Can you next time label the complete series as "v2": [PATCH 0/3 v2] embed drm_gem_object into radeon_bo (don't ask me if git can create this automatically for you). F

[PATCH 0/3] radeon: add pageflip support

2010-10-26 Thread Alex Deucher
This set of patches adds pageflipping support for radeon. There are two drm patches and one ddx patch required. The drm patches are against Dave's drm-next branch and the ddx patch is against git master. So far it's been lightly tested with openarena on a variety of radeons. Feedback appreciated

[PATCH 0/3] radeon: add pageflip support

2010-10-26 Thread Alex Deucher
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 4:30 AM, Alex Deucher wrote: > This set of patches adds pageflipping support for radeon. > There are two drm patches and one ddx patch required. ?The > drm patches are against Dave's drm-next branch and the ddx > patch is against git master. ?So far it's been lightly tested

[PATCH 0/3] radeon: add pageflip support

2010-10-26 Thread Alex Deucher
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 4:55 AM, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 4:30 AM, Alex Deucher > wrote: >> This set of patches adds pageflipping support for radeon. >> There are two drm patches and one ddx patch required. ?The >> drm patches are against Dave's drm-next branch and the ddx >

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >