On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 15:55:27 +0200, Tomi Valkeinen
wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> Ping.
>
> Are you fine with me proceeding with the current V4L2 port/endpoint
> bindings?
Sorry, this thread didn't make it past my email filters. Yes, go ahead.
g.
Hi Grant,
Ping.
Are you fine with me proceeding with the current V4L2 port/endpoint
bindings?
Tomi
On 12/03/14 10:15, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> On 28/02/14 14:20, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This series is a re-send of
>>
Hi Grant,
On 28/02/14 14:20, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This series is a re-send of
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree/61739
>
> I'm cc'ing more people, and I want to clarify the contents of the series:
>
> While this has been developed for OMAP, only the first
Hi Rob,
On 10/03/14 18:05, Rob Herring wrote:
>> Russell's point was that these connector bindings are very generic, i.e.
>> they are not for any particular chip from a particular vendor, but for
>> any connector for DVI, HDMI or analog-tv. And he's worried that maybe we
>> shouldn't define such
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Tomi Valkeinen
wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 10/03/14 18:05, Rob Herring wrote:
>
>>> Russell's point was that these connector bindings are very generic, i.e.
>>> they are not for any particular chip from a particular vendor, but for
>>> any connector for DVI, HDMI or
On 03/03/14 10:04, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> Hi Rob, Pawel, Mark, Ian, Kumar,
Ping,
Any hints on how to continue with this?
> On 28/02/14 18:56, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 06:48:35PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>>> This is totally unclear to me. How does it become
Hi Rob, Pawel, Mark, Ian, Kumar,
On 28/02/14 18:56, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 06:48:35PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> This is totally unclear to me. How does it become a public standard?
>> What's the forum for this?
>
> Me too. That's where I'd hope someone
On 28/02/14 18:27, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 02:20:07PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> Shortly about the display components in the series, in the order of probable
>> public interest:
>>
>> * Analog TV, DVI and HDMI Connectors represent a respective connector on
On 28/02/14 15:51, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>> TPD requires a power. Who turns that on? It also has two GPIOs, LS_OE
>> and CT_CP_HPD, which need to be controlled based on what the user wants
>> and the state of the HPD line. Who controls those?
>
> Strictly speaking TPD12S015 has _no_ GPIO
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 06:48:35PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> This is totally unclear to me. How does it become a public standard?
> What's the forum for this?
Me too. That's where I'd hope someone on devicetree-discuss will be
able to help us work out what's the right approach here. :)
--
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 02:51:22PM +0100, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> Is it really the logical place to handle HPD? I'd have put it into the
> HDMI encoder because it's the unit most interested in the state of HPD.
I think this is where differences in hardware become a problem.
Yes, it makes
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 02:20:07PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> Shortly about the display components in the series, in the order of probable
> public interest:
>
> * Analog TV, DVI and HDMI Connectors represent a respective connector on the
> board. They don't do much, but they do mark the
On 28/02/14 14:57, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> Out of curiosity, will there be DT nodes for pull-up resistors soon,
> too? ;)
If they don't work automatically, yes, we need DT nodes and drivers for
them.
> Honestly, TPD12S015 is a level shifter, there is nothing in it that
> would justify a
On 02/28/14 14:47, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 28.02.2014, 13:57 +0100 schrieb Sebastian Hesselbarth:
>> On 02/28/14 13:20, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>>> This series is a re-send of
>>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree/61739
>>>
>> ...
>>> Shortly about the display
On 02/28/14 14:14, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 28/02/14 14:57, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>
>> Out of curiosity, will there be DT nodes for pull-up resistors soon,
>> too? ;)
>
> If they don't work automatically, yes, we need DT nodes and drivers for
> them.
>
>> Honestly, TPD12S015 is a level
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 28.02.2014, 13:57 +0100 schrieb Sebastian Hesselbarth:
> On 02/28/14 13:20, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > This series is a re-send of
> > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree/61739
> >
> ...
> > Shortly about the display components in the series, in the order of
Hi,
This series is a re-send of
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree/61739
I'm cc'ing more people, and I want to clarify the contents of the series:
While this has been developed for OMAP, only the first patch is about OMAP
bindings. The rest are generic bindings for video
On 02/28/14 13:20, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> This series is a re-send of
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree/61739
>
...
> Shortly about the display components in the series, in the order of probable
> public interest:
>
> * Analog TV, DVI and HDMI Connectors represent a
Hi Tomi,
On 28.02.2014 13:20, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This series is a re-send of
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree/61739
>
> I'm cc'ing more people, and I want to clarify the contents of the series:
>
> While this has been developed for OMAP, only the first patch
19 matches
Mail list logo
