On Mon, 06 Mar 2023 11:07:12 +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> I had reasons to look closer at the MSM DRM driver error handling and
> realised that it had suffered from a fair amount of bit rot over the
> years.
>
> Unfortunately, I started fixing this in my 6.2 branch and failed to
> notice two
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 05:21:56PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 21/03/2023 15:02, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 11:07:12AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> >> I had reasons to look closer at the MSM DRM driver error handling and
> >> realised that it had suffered from a fair
On 21/03/2023 15:02, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 11:07:12AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
I had reasons to look closer at the MSM DRM driver error handling and
realised that it had suffered from a fair amount of bit rot over the
years.
Unfortunately, I started fixing this in my
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 11:07:12AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> I had reasons to look closer at the MSM DRM driver error handling and
> realised that it had suffered from a fair amount of bit rot over the
> years.
>
> Unfortunately, I started fixing this in my 6.2 branch and failed to
> notice
I had reasons to look closer at the MSM DRM driver error handling and
realised that it had suffered from a fair amount of bit rot over the
years.
Unfortunately, I started fixing this in my 6.2 branch and failed to
notice two partial and, as it turned out, broken attempts to address
this that are
