On 7/28/22 16:44, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 04:41:41PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Fri, 1 Jul 2022 20:52:53 +0200, d...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Danilo Krummrich
This patch series initializes IDRs with idr_init_base(, 1) rather than
idr_init() in case for the particular
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 04:41:41PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jul 2022 20:52:53 +0200, d...@redhat.com wrote:
> > From: Danilo Krummrich
> >
> > This patch series initializes IDRs with idr_init_base(, 1) rather than
> > idr_init() in case for the particular IDR no IDs < 1 are ever
On Fri, 1 Jul 2022 20:52:53 +0200, d...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Danilo Krummrich
>
> This patch series initializes IDRs with idr_init_base(, 1) rather than
> idr_init() in case for the particular IDR no IDs < 1 are ever requested -
> this avoids unnecessary tree walks.
>
> Danilo Krummrich
Hi Laurent,
On 7/1/22 20:52, d...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Danilo Krummrich
This patch series initializes IDRs with idr_init_base(, 1) rather than
idr_init() in case for the particular IDR no IDs < 1 are ever requested -
this avoids unnecessary tree walks.
Guess this would go through
Am 01.07.22 um 20:52 schrieb d...@redhat.com:
From: Danilo Krummrich
This patch series initializes IDRs with idr_init_base(, 1) rather than
idr_init() in case for the particular IDR no IDs < 1 are ever requested -
this avoids unnecessary tree walks.
Feel free to add Reviewed-by: Christian
From: Danilo Krummrich
This patch series initializes IDRs with idr_init_base(, 1) rather than
idr_init() in case for the particular IDR no IDs < 1 are ever requested -
this avoids unnecessary tree walks.
Danilo Krummrich (10):
drm/amdgpu: use idr_init_base() to initialize mgr->ctx_handles
