On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 09:54:36PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, September 25, 2014 04:27:58 PM Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >
> > --Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> > Content-Disposition: inline
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> >
> >
On Thursday, September 25, 2014 04:27:58 PM Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> --Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 09:22:01AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 25,
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 09:22:01AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 01:27:18PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 03:32:19PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > > > > OK, I guess this is as good as it gets.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What tree would you like it go
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 03:32:19PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > > OK, I guess this is as good as it gets.
> > > >
> > > > What tree would you like it go through?
> > >
> > > Do we really need this new helper ? I mean, the very moment when we
> > > decide to implement ->runtime_idle() we will
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:28:07PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> OK, I guess this is as good as it gets.
>
> What tree would you like it go through?
Since rest of the patches are dependent upon 1st patch which should go thru
your tree, we should merge this thru your tree
Thanks
--
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 01:27:18PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 03:32:19PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > > > OK, I guess this is as good as it gets.
> > > > >
> > > > > What tree would you like it go through?
> > > >
> > > > Do we really need this new helper ? I mean,
On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 03:15:58 PM Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:28:07PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 09:44:50 PM Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > This patch series adds a simple macro
> > > pm_runtime_last_busy_and_autosuspend()
> > >
On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 09:44:50 PM Vinod Koul wrote:
> This patch series adds a simple macro pm_runtime_last_busy_and_autosuspend()
> which invokes pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() and pm_runtime_put_autosuspend()
> sequentially. Then we do a tree wide update of current patterns which are
>
This patch series adds a simple macro pm_runtime_last_busy_and_autosuspend()
which invokes pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() and pm_runtime_put_autosuspend()
sequentially. Then we do a tree wide update of current patterns which are
present. As evident from log below this pattern is frequent in the
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:46:17PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 03:15:58 PM Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:28:07PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 09:44:50 PM Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > > This patch
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:28:07PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 09:44:50 PM Vinod Koul wrote:
> > This patch series adds a simple macro pm_runtime_last_busy_and_autosuspend()
> > which invokes pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() and pm_runtime_put_autosuspend()
> >
11 matches
Mail list logo
