[PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-29 Thread Grigori Goronzy
On 26.06.2013 23:57, Julian Wollrath wrote: > Hi, > > I just tried the DPM support out on a E-450 APU (HD6320) and it did not > work like expected. In the terminal everything seemed ok but when I > started a display manager, the screen showed garbage and the system > basically locked up. The radeon

[PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-29 Thread Ilyes Gouta
Hi, > Yes, this works on my rv790 games get high and using vdpau/gl for video stays low (which is nice as the fan on my card is too noisy on high). > > One thing which I guess 99.999% of people won't notice is that doing any thing with plain X + fluxbox (so no compositing) very briefly ramps up th

Re: [PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-29 Thread Grigori Goronzy
On 26.06.2013 23:57, Julian Wollrath wrote: Hi, I just tried the DPM support out on a E-450 APU (HD6320) and it did not work like expected. In the terminal everything seemed ok but when I started a display manager, the screen showed garbage and the system basically locked up. The radeon and drm

[PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-29 Thread Andy Furniss
Alex Deucher wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Andy Furniss wrote: >> Alex Deucher wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 9:21 AM, wrote: From: Alex Deucher These are the radeon patches for 3.11. Some of these patches are huge so, it might be easier to review t

Re: [PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-29 Thread Ilyes Gouta
Hi, > Yes, this works on my rv790 games get high and using vdpau/gl for video stays low (which is nice as the fan on my card is too noisy on high). > > One thing which I guess 99.999% of people won't notice is that doing any thing with plain X + fluxbox (so no compositing) very briefly ramps up th

Re: [PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-29 Thread Andy Furniss
Alex Deucher wrote: On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Andy Furniss wrote: Alex Deucher wrote: On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 9:21 AM, wrote: From: Alex Deucher These are the radeon patches for 3.11. Some of these patches are huge so, it might be easier to review things here: http://cgit.freede

[PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-28 Thread Laurent Carlier
Le 28/06/2013 01:55, Alex Deucher a ?crit : > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Andy Furniss wrote: >> Alex Deucher wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 9:21 AM, wrote: From: Alex Deucher These are the radeon patches for 3.11. Some of these patches are huge so, it mig

Re: [PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-28 Thread Laurent Carlier
Le 28/06/2013 01:55, Alex Deucher a écrit : > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Andy Furniss wrote: >> Alex Deucher wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 9:21 AM, wrote: From: Alex Deucher These are the radeon patches for 3.11. Some of these patches are huge so, it mig

Re: [PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-28 Thread Julian Wollrath
Hi, > This patch should fix your issue : > > http://people.freedesktop.org/~glisse/0001-radeon-do-no-schedule-thermal-work-if-dpm-is-not-ena.patch > yes, that seems to do the trick (but I can not be 100% sure, since I only saw the warning once). > > Cheers, > Jerome Best regards, Julian __

[PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-27 Thread Julian Wollrath
Hi, > This patch should fix your issue : > > http://people.freedesktop.org/~glisse/0001-radeon-do-no-schedule-thermal-work-if-dpm-is-not-ena.patch > yes, that seems to do the trick (but I can not be 100% sure, since I only saw the warning once). > > Cheers, > Jerome Best regards, Julian

[PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-27 Thread Alex Deucher
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Andy Furniss wrote: > Alex Deucher wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 9:21 AM, wrote: >>> >>> From: Alex Deucher >>> >>> These are the radeon patches for 3.11. Some of these patches >>> are huge so, it might be easier to review things here: >>> http://cgit.fr

[PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-27 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 6:19 PM, James Cloos wrote: >> "AD" == Alex Deucher writes: > > AD> Nope. 6xx and APUs do not require ucode. only 7xx+ dGPUs. > > Does that mean that APUs do not require *any* ucode blobs? > > Or just that they do not require updated or additional blobs > for the new

[PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-27 Thread James Cloos
> "AD" == Alex Deucher writes: AD> Nope. 6xx and APUs do not require ucode. only 7xx+ dGPUs. Does that mean that APUs do not require *any* ucode blobs? Or just that they do not require updated or additional blobs for the new functionality like DPM? -JimC -- James Cloos OpenPGP:

Re: [PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-27 Thread Alex Deucher
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Andy Furniss wrote: > Alex Deucher wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 9:21 AM, wrote: >>> >>> From: Alex Deucher >>> >>> These are the radeon patches for 3.11. Some of these patches >>> are huge so, it might be easier to review things here: >>> http://cgit.fr

Re: [PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-27 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 6:19 PM, James Cloos wrote: >> "AD" == Alex Deucher writes: > > AD> Nope. 6xx and APUs do not require ucode. only 7xx+ dGPUs. > > Does that mean that APUs do not require *any* ucode blobs? > > Or just that they do not require updated or additional blobs > for the new

Re: [PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-27 Thread James Cloos
> "AD" == Alex Deucher writes: AD> Nope. 6xx and APUs do not require ucode. only 7xx+ dGPUs. Does that mean that APUs do not require *any* ucode blobs? Or just that they do not require updated or additional blobs for the new functionality like DPM? -JimC -- James Cloos OpenPGP:

[PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-27 Thread Andy Furniss
Alex Deucher wrote: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 9:21 AM, wrote: >> From: Alex Deucher >> >> These are the radeon patches for 3.11. Some of these patches >> are huge so, it might be easier to review things here: >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux/log/?h=drm-next-3.11-wip > > Updated branc

[PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-27 Thread Alex Deucher
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Andy Furniss wrote: > Alex Deucher wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 9:21 AM, wrote: >>> >>> From: Alex Deucher >>> >>> These are the radeon patches for 3.11. Some of these patches >>> are huge so, it might be easier to review things here: >>> http://cgit.fr

[PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-27 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Julian Wollrath wrote: > Hi, > >> I just tried the DPM support out on a E-450 APU (HD6320) and it did >> not work like expected. In the terminal everything seemed ok but when >> I started a display manager, the screen showed garbage and the system >> basically lock

Re: [PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-27 Thread Alex Deucher
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Andy Furniss wrote: > Alex Deucher wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 9:21 AM, wrote: >>> >>> From: Alex Deucher >>> >>> These are the radeon patches for 3.11. Some of these patches >>> are huge so, it might be easier to review things here: >>> http://cgit.fr

Re: [PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-27 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Julian Wollrath wrote: > Hi, > >> I just tried the DPM support out on a E-450 APU (HD6320) and it did >> not work like expected. In the terminal everything seemed ok but when >> I started a display manager, the screen showed garbage and the system >> basically lock

Re: [PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-27 Thread Andy Furniss
Alex Deucher wrote: On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 9:21 AM, wrote: From: Alex Deucher These are the radeon patches for 3.11. Some of these patches are huge so, it might be easier to review things here: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux/log/?h=drm-next-3.11-wip Updated branch: http://cgit.

Re: [PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-27 Thread Julian Wollrath
Hi, > I just tried the DPM support out on a E-450 APU (HD6320) and it did > not work like expected. In the terminal everything seemed ok but when > I started a display manager, the screen showed garbage and the system > basically locked up. The radeon and drm related parts of the syslog > are belo

[PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-27 Thread Julian Wollrath
Hi, I just tried the DPM support out on a E-450 APU (HD6320) and it did not work like expected. In the terminal everything seemed ok but when I started a display manager, the screen showed garbage and the system basically locked up. The radeon and drm related parts of the syslog are below. If you

[PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-27 Thread Julian Wollrath
Hi, > I just tried the DPM support out on a E-450 APU (HD6320) and it did > not work like expected. In the terminal everything seemed ok but when > I started a display manager, the screen showed garbage and the system > basically locked up. The radeon and drm related parts of the syslog > are belo

[PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-26 Thread Julian Wollrath
Hi, I just tried the DPM support out on a E-450 APU (HD6320) and it did not work like expected. In the terminal everything seemed ok but when I started a display manager, the screen showed garbage and the system basically locked up. The radeon and drm related parts of the syslog are below. If you

[PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-26 Thread Alex Deucher
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 9:21 AM, wrote: > From: Alex Deucher > > These are the radeon patches for 3.11. Some of these patches > are huge so, it might be easier to review things here: > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux/log/?h=drm-next-3.11-wip Updated branch: http://cgit.freedesktop.org

Re: [PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-26 Thread Alex Deucher
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 9:21 AM, wrote: > From: Alex Deucher > > These are the radeon patches for 3.11. Some of these patches > are huge so, it might be easier to review things here: > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux/log/?h=drm-next-3.11-wip Updated branch: http://cgit.freedesktop.org

Re: [PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-26 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 09:21:20AM -0400, alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote: > From: Alex Deucher > > These are the radeon patches for 3.11. Some of these patches > are huge so, it might be easier to review things here: > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux/log/?h=drm-next-3.11-wip > > I'll send

[PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-26 Thread alexdeuc...@gmail.com
From: Alex Deucher These are the radeon patches for 3.11. Some of these patches are huge so, it might be easier to review things here: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux/log/?h=drm-next-3.11-wip I'll send a formal pull in request in the next day or two. Highlights of this series: - DPM s

[PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-26 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 09:21:20AM -0400, alexdeucher at gmail.com wrote: > From: Alex Deucher > > These are the radeon patches for 3.11. Some of these patches > are huge so, it might be easier to review things here: > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux/log/?h=drm-next-3.11-wip > > I'll s

[PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-26 Thread alexdeucher
From: Alex Deucher These are the radeon patches for 3.11. Some of these patches are huge so, it might be easier to review things here: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux/log/?h=drm-next-3.11-wip I'll send a formal pull in request in the next day or two. Highlights of this series: - DPM s