On 7/20/2021 7:17 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 07:12:26PM +0300, Diana Craciun OSS wrote:
On 7/15/2021 3:20 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
FSL uses the internal reflck to implement the open_device() functionality,
conversion to the core code is straightforward.
The decision
On 7/15/2021 3:20 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
FSL uses the internal reflck to implement the open_device() functionality,
conversion to the core code is straightforward.
The decision on which set to be part of is trivially based on the
is_fsl_mc_bus_dprc() and we use a 'struct device *' pointer
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 07:23:35PM +0300, Diana Craciun OSS wrote:
> I have tested the changes and everything works as expected.
Great, thanks, I added a Tested-by for you
Jason
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 07:12:26PM +0300, Diana Craciun OSS wrote:
> On 7/15/2021 3:20 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > FSL uses the internal reflck to implement the open_device() functionality,
> > conversion to the core code is straightforward.
> >
> > The decision on which set to be part of is
FSL uses the internal reflck to implement the open_device() functionality,
conversion to the core code is straightforward.
The decision on which set to be part of is trivially based on the
is_fsl_mc_bus_dprc() and we use a 'struct device *' pointer as the set_id.
It isn't entirely clear what the
