On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:21:52AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 02:35:07PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > irq handlers always run with interrupts locally disabled, so
> > plain spinlocks is all we need. I've also reviewed again that they
> > all follow the _irq_handler post
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:28:18PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:21:52AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 02:35:07PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > irq handlers always run with interrupts locally disabled, so
> > > plain spinlocks is all we need.
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 02:35:07PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> irq handlers always run with interrupts locally disabled, so
> plain spinlocks is all we need. I've also reviewed again that they
> all follow the _irq_handler postfix convention.
Hmm, we still have the full irq dance inside the reg
irq handlers always run with interrupts locally disabled, so
plain spinlocks is all we need. I've also reviewed again that they
all follow the _irq_handler postfix convention.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 15 ++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+),
