With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepable
context, the work items can't be flushed from there. Instead, init
and flush from nouveau_load/unload().
Signed-off-b
With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepable
context, the work items can't be flushed from there. Instead, init
and flush from nouveau_load/unload().
Signed-off-b
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
>
> Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepable
> context, the work items can't be flushed from there. Ins
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 11:07 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> > Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
> >
> > Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepa
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 11:16:05AM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 11:07 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> > > Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq i
With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepable
context, the work items can't be flushed from there. Instead, init
and flush from nouveau_load/unload().
Signed-off-b
With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepable
context, the work items can't be flushed from there. Instead, init
and flush from nouveau_load/unload().
Signed-off-b
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
>
> Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepable
> context, the work items can't be flushed from there. Ins
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 11:07 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> > Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
> >
> > Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepa
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 11:16:05AM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 11:07 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> > > Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq i
With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepable
context, the work items can't be flushed from there. Instead, init
and flush from nouveau_load/unload().
Signed-off-b
With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepable
context, the work items can't be flushed from there. Instead, init
and flush from nouveau_load/unload().
Signed-off-b
With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepable
context, the work items can't be flushed from there. Instead, init
and flush from nouveau_load/unload().
Signed-off-b
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
>
> Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepable
> context, the work items can't be flushed from there. Ins
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 11:07 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> > Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
> >
> > Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepa
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 11:16:05AM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 11:07 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> > > Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq i
With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepable
context, the work items can't be flushed from there. Instead, init
and flush from nouveau_load/unload().
Signed-off-b
With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepable
context, the work items can't be flushed from there. Instead, init
and flush from nouveau_load/unload().
Signed-off-b
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
>
> Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepable
> context, the work items can't be flushed from there. Ins
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 11:07 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> > Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
> >
> > Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepa
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 11:16:05AM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 11:07 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> > > Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq i
With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepable
context, the work items can't be flushed from there. Instead, init
and flush from nouveau_load/unload().
Signed-off-b
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
>
> Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepable
> context, the work items can't be flushed from there. Ins
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 11:07 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> > Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
> >
> > Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepa
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 11:16:05AM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 11:07 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> > > Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq i
With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepable
context, the work items can't be flushed from there. Instead, init
and flush from nouveau_load/unload().
Signed-off-b
With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepable
context, the work items can't be flushed from there. Instead, init
and flush from nouveau_load/unload().
Signed-off-b
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
>
> Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepable
> context, the work items can't be flushed from there. Ins
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 11:07 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> > Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
> >
> > Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepa
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 11:16:05AM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 11:07 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> > > Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq i
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
>
> Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepable
> context, the work items can't be flushed from there. Ins
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 11:07 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> > Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
> >
> > Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepa
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 11:16:05AM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 11:07 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> > > Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq i
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
>
> Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepable
> context, the work items can't be flushed from there. Ins
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 11:07 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> > Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
> >
> > Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepa
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 11:16:05AM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 11:07 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> > > Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq i
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
>
> Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepable
> context, the work items can't be flushed from there. Ins
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 11:07 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> > Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
> >
> > Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepa
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 11:16:05AM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 11:07 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> > > Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq i
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
>
> Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepable
> context, the work items can't be flushed from there. Ins
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 11:07 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> > Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
> >
> > Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepa
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 11:16:05AM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 11:07 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> > > Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq i
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
>
> Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepable
> context, the work items can't be flushed from there. Ins
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 11:07 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> > Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
> >
> > Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepa
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 11:16:05AM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 11:07 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> > > Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq i
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
>
> Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepable
> context, the work items can't be flushed from there. Ins
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 11:07 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> > Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
> >
> > Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepa
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 11:16:05AM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 11:07 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> > > Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq i
48 matches
Mail list logo
