[REGRESSION] [PATCH 09/22] drm: Clean up pending events in the core

2016-01-25 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Hey, Op 11-01-16 om 22:41 schreef Daniel Vetter: > There's really no reason to not do so, instead of replicating this > for every use-case and every driver. Now we can't just nuke the events, > since that would still mean that all drm_event users would need to know > when that has happened, since

[PATCH 09/22] drm: Clean up pending events in the core

2016-01-14 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Daniel, Thank you for the patch. On Monday 11 January 2016 22:41:03 Daniel Vetter wrote: > There's really no reason to not do so, instead of replicating this > for every use-case and every driver. Now we can't just nuke the events, > since that would still mean that all drm_event users would n

[PATCH 09/22] drm: Clean up pending events in the core

2016-01-11 Thread Daniel Vetter
There's really no reason to not do so, instead of replicating this for every use-case and every driver. Now we can't just nuke the events, since that would still mean that all drm_event users would need to know when that has happened, since calling e.g. drm_send_event isn't allowed any more. Instea