On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 4:12 PM, wrote:
>
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Emil Velikov wrote:
>
> Although last time around people leaned towards the __uX types, if we
>> have a consensus amongst drm (kernel) developers about using stdint
>> ones everything should be fine.
>> We just need a handful of ack
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 04:05:21PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 22 August 2016 at 15:38, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> >>> That said, _note_ that some applications are built with -C89 -pedantic
> >>> [1] which means that using stdint.h may or may
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> That said, _note_ that some applications are built with -C89 -pedantic
>> [1] which means that using stdint.h may or may not work as expected.
>> So we'll want a __STDC_VESION__ check + #error in case of pre-C99 ?
>> If the affected programs ar
On 22 August 2016 at 15:38, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> That said, _note_ that some applications are built with -C89 -pedantic
>>> [1] which means that using stdint.h may or may not work as expected.
>>> So we'll want a __STDC_VESION__ check + #er
On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Emil Velikov
> wrote:
>>
>> All I can think of is that you (?) are porting some changes from the
>> kernel to libdrm or vice-versa. In the latter case please _don't_ do
>> that. Work with your changes in upstream kerne
On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Although last time around people leaned towards the __uX types, if we
> have a consensus amongst drm (kernel) developers about using stdint
> ones everything should be fine.
> We just need a handful of acks from the different maintainers.
>
My opinio
On Sat, 20 Aug 2016, Emil Velikov wrote:
>
> If you or any !Linux folks are around on XDC we should really sit down
> and untangle some/all of these issues.
>
> Thanks
> Emil
>
If there was to be some sort of BoF (doesn't have to be formal, and
could be an after-hours event), I would inves
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 09:48:10AM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 20 August 2016 at 23:31, Rob Clark wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Mikko Rapeli
> > wrote:
> >> Cc'ing lkml too.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:54:21PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> >>> Story time:
> >>> I was dr
Am 22.08.2016 um 10:48 schrieb Emil Velikov:
>
> Although last time around people leaned towards the __uX types, if we
> have a consensus amongst drm (kernel) developers about using stdint
> ones everything should be fine.
> We just need a handful of acks from the different maintainers.
For the re
On 20 August 2016 at 23:31, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
>> Cc'ing lkml too.
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:54:21PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>> Story time:
>>> I was dreaming of a day were we can stop installing these headers,
>>> thus making deprec
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Emil Velikov
wrote:
> On 20 August 2016 at 16:08, Marek Olšák wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Emil Velikov
>> wrote:
>>> On 20 August 2016 at 12:47, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Emil Velikov >>> gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Emil Velikov
wrote:
>> While I understand some people want to discuss this further, these
>> patches must land first in order bring back the compatibility with
>> libdrm.
> This is where the misunderstanding lies - there _must_ _not_ be
> compatible with the libdr
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 4:48 AM, Emil Velikov
wrote:
> On 20 August 2016 at 23:31, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
>>> Cc'ing lkml too.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:54:21PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
Story time:
I was dreaming of a day we
Am 20.08.2016 um 19:58 schrieb Mikko Rapeli:
> Cc'ing lkml too.
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:54:21PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> Story time:
>> I was dreaming of a day were we can stop installing these headers,
>> thus making deprecation a bit easier process.
>> Yet after failing to convince Da
Cc'ing lkml.
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 12:05:54PM +0200, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 12:54 AM, Emil Velikov
> wrote:
> > On 19 August 2016 at 15:26, Christian König
> > wrote:
> >> Am 19.08.2016 um 15:50 schrieb Marek Olšák:
> >>>
> >>> From: Marek Olšák
> >>>
> >>> This
Cc'ing lkml.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 09:18:24PM -0500, Ken Phillis Jr wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:46 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>
> > perhaps, but if the target audience for driver specific APIs is
> > libdrm/mesa, which already uses stdint types, then I fail to see the
> > point..
> >
> > It i
Cc'ing lkml too.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:54:21PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Story time:
> I was dreaming of a day were we can stop installing these headers,
> thus making deprecation a bit easier process.
> Yet after failing to convince Dave and Daniel on a number of occasions
> I've accepted
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 8:08 PM, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
>> Cc'ing lkml.
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 12:05:54PM +0200, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 12:54 AM, Emil Velikov >> gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > On 19 August 2016 at 15:2
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 8:08 PM, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> Cc'ing lkml.
>
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 12:05:54PM +0200, Marek Olšák wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 12:54 AM, Emil Velikov
>> wrote:
>> > On 19 August 2016 at 15:26, Christian König
>> > wrote:
>> >> Am 19.08.2016 um 15:50 schrieb
On 20 August 2016 at 16:08, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Emil Velikov
> wrote:
>> On 20 August 2016 at 12:47, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Emil Velikov
>>> wrote:
On 20 August 2016 at 11:05, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 2
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> Cc'ing lkml too.
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:54:21PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> Story time:
>> I was dreaming of a day were we can stop installing these headers,
>> thus making deprecation a bit easier process.
>> Yet after failing to co
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Emil Velikov
wrote:
> On 20 August 2016 at 12:47, Marek Olšák wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Emil Velikov
>> wrote:
>>> On 20 August 2016 at 11:05, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 12:54 AM, Emil Velikov >>> gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Emil Velikov
wrote:
> On 20 August 2016 at 11:05, Marek Olšák wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 12:54 AM, Emil Velikov
>> wrote:
>>> On 19 August 2016 at 15:26, Christian König
>>> wrote:
Am 19.08.2016 um 15:50 schrieb Marek Olšák:
>
> From:
On 20 August 2016 at 12:47, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Emil Velikov
> wrote:
>> On 20 August 2016 at 11:05, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 12:54 AM, Emil Velikov >> gmail.com> wrote:
On 19 August 2016 at 15:26, Christian König
wrote:
>
On 20 August 2016 at 11:05, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 12:54 AM, Emil Velikov
> wrote:
>> On 19 August 2016 at 15:26, Christian König
>> wrote:
>>> Am 19.08.2016 um 15:50 schrieb Marek Olšák:
From: Marek Olšák
This reverts commit 2ce9dde0d47f2f94ab
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 12:54 AM, Emil Velikov
wrote:
> On 19 August 2016 at 15:26, Christian König
> wrote:
>> Am 19.08.2016 um 15:50 schrieb Marek Olšák:
>>>
>>> From: Marek Olšák
>>>
>>> This reverts commit 2ce9dde0d47f2f94ab25c73a30596a7328bcdf1f.
>>>
>>> See the comment in the code.
On 19 August 2016 at 15:26, Christian König wrote:
> Am 19.08.2016 um 15:50 schrieb Marek Olšák:
>>
>> From: Marek Olšák
>>
>> This reverts commit 2ce9dde0d47f2f94ab25c73a30596a7328bcdf1f.
>>
>> See the comment in the code. Basically, don't do cleanups in this header.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ma
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Ken Phillis Jr wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>
>> tbh, I'm all in favor of making it easier to sync kernel headers to
>> libdrm, etc.
>>
>> But kernel *does* have stdint types. Just (for some reason that
>> completely baffles me) not
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:46 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> perhaps, but if the target audience for driver specific APIs is
> libdrm/mesa, which already uses stdint types, then I fail to see the
> point..
>
> It is a bit difference scenario for some of the core kms ioctls which
> are not driver specific.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> tbh, I'm all in favor of making it easier to sync kernel headers to
> libdrm, etc.
>
> But kernel *does* have stdint types. Just (for some reason that
> completely baffles me) not in stdint.h so we can't include that from
> the uapi headers the
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Emil Velikov
wrote:
> On 19 August 2016 at 15:26, Christian König
> wrote:
>> Am 19.08.2016 um 15:50 schrieb Marek Olšák:
>>>
>>> From: Marek Olšák
>>>
>>> This reverts commit 2ce9dde0d47f2f94ab25c73a30596a7328bcdf1f.
>>>
>>> See the comment in the code. B
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Mikko Rapeli
>>> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 04:26:40PM +0200, Christian König wr
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 04:26:40PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
Am 19.08.2016 um 15:50 schrieb Marek Olšák:
>Fro
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 04:26:40PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
>>> Am 19.08.2016 um 15:50 schrieb Marek Olšák:
>>> >From: Marek Olšák
>>> >
>>> >This reverts commit 2ce9dde0d47f
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 04:26:40PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Am 19.08.2016 um 15:50 schrieb Marek Olšák:
> >From: Marek Olšák
> >
> >This reverts commit 2ce9dde0d47f2f94ab25c73a30596a7328bcdf1f.
> >
> >See the comment in the code. Basically, don't do cleanups in this header.
> >
> >Sign
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 04:26:40PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 19.08.2016 um 15:50 schrieb Marek Olšák:
>> >From: Marek Olšák
>> >
>> >This reverts commit 2ce9dde0d47f2f94ab25c73a30596a7328bcdf1f.
>> >
>> >See the comment in the
Am 19.08.2016 um 15:50 schrieb Marek Olšák:
> From: Marek Olšák
>
> This reverts commit 2ce9dde0d47f2f94ab25c73a30596a7328bcdf1f.
>
> See the comment in the code. Basically, don't do cleanups in this header.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Olšák
I completely agree with you that this was a bad mov
From: Marek Olšák
This reverts commit 2ce9dde0d47f2f94ab25c73a30596a7328bcdf1f.
See the comment in the code. Basically, don't do cleanups in this header.
Signed-off-by: Marek Olšák
---
include/uapi/drm/amdgpu_drm.h | 295 +-
1 file changed, 150 inse
38 matches
Mail list logo
