On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 09:32:41AM +0300, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
> I did it like this, because I don't have a board with the P/N in the
You use this 'P/N' both here and in the binding document, to me this is
just too generic and confusing.
Just use some wording that people familiar with the
On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 7:53 PM Francesco Dolcini wrote:
>
> Hello Alexandru, thanks for your patch.
>
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 01:59:24PM +0300, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
> > On some HW designs, it's easier for the layout if the P/N pins are swapped.
> > In those cases, we need to adjust (for
Hello Alexandru, thanks for your patch.
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 01:59:24PM +0300, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
> On some HW designs, it's easier for the layout if the P/N pins are swapped.
> In those cases, we need to adjust (for this) by configuring the MIPI analog
> registers differently.
On some HW designs, it's easier for the layout if the P/N pins are swapped.
In those cases, we need to adjust (for this) by configuring the MIPI analog
registers differently. Specifically, register 0x3e needs to be 0xf6
(instead of 0xd6).
This change adds a 'lontium,pn-swap' device-tree property
